My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-13-13-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
05-13-13-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2013 3:02:51 PM
Creation date
5/9/2013 8:52:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—MAY 13, 2013 8 <br /> Councilmember Holden asked if the signs were meant to be read by passing traffic. She <br /> expressed concern with the safety of passing traffic trying to read these signs along major <br /> roadways. <br /> Community Development Intern Bachler believed the sign located on Highway 96 and <br /> Highway 10 is intended to be viewed by passing vehicular traffic. He explained the sign located <br /> on the Rice Creek Trail is intended to be seen by those on bicycles. <br /> Mayor Grant understands Councilmember Holden's concerns. He is in favor of the signs being <br /> posted as they indicate that the remediation work is being completed on the site by Ramsey <br /> County. <br /> Councilmember Holden agreed it is in the best interest of Arden Hills for this information to be <br /> posted. She recommended the sign size be increased by Ramsey County. <br /> Councilmember Holmes questioned if the sign at the trail will have the same wording. <br /> Community Development Intern Bachler stated it is his understanding that each sign will have <br /> the same wording. <br /> MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Mayor Grant seconded a motion to <br /> approve Planning Case 13-006 for a Sign Standard Adjustment at the Twin <br /> Cities Ammunition Plant site, based on the findings of fact and the submitted <br /> plans with the signs not to exceed 50 square feet, as amended by the two <br /> conditions in the May 13,2013, report to the City Council. <br /> Councilmember Holmes does not agree with increasing the sign size as this is not the size <br /> requested by Ramsey County. <br /> Mayor Grant thought the Council had the right to adjust the size within the approval process. It <br /> is his opinion that the four signs at increased size is reasonable and offers additional flexibility. <br /> Councilmember McClung agreed with the increased sign size adjustment as it will benefit <br /> passing traffic. <br /> Councilmember Holmes questioned if the request will have to be reviewed again by the Planning <br /> Commission because of the proposed sign size adjustment. <br /> Mayor Grant commented that the Planning Commission is a recommending body and the <br /> Council has the right to make adjustments. <br /> City Administrator Klaers stated the Council does have the right to make adjustments. <br /> The motion carried (5-0). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.