My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-28-13-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
05-28-13-R
>
05-28-13-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2013 8:30:25 AM
Creation date
5/28/2013 8:29:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
05-28-13 Regular City Council Packet
General - Type
05-28-13 Regular City Council Packet
Category
05-28-13 Regular City Council Packet
Date
5/28/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MARCH 18, 20132 <br /> <br />City Administrator Klaers <br />stated that the reason this item is being discussed is because the <br />television in the lobby is outdated and needs to be replaced due to its graphic display issues. He <br />noted that the television is currently housed in a built-in on the backside of the wall where the <br />vending machine is currently located. Assuming a flat screen television replaces the current tube- <br />style television, it will not fit in the built-in area. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant <br />confirmed that the television has not been working well. He stated the slides <br />playing on the local cable access channel featuring upcoming events are almost unreadable. <br /> <br />City Administrator Klaers <br />stated that since more storage is needed for tables and chairs, it <br />seemed like a good time for modest modifications to the television area. He noted that a flat- <br />screen television could be mounted on the wall over the fireplace or it could be mounted on the <br />wall the current television is located on. He suggested that if a television is mounted on the <br />existing wall, a table or shelf placed underneath would be a good idea to keep people from <br />running into it since it is a hallway area that has foot-traffic. <br /> <br />Building Official Scherbel <br />noted that it would be most cost-effective to leave the television on <br />the wall where it is currently located. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden <br />questioned whether the Audio Visual (AV) room (which also shares a <br />wall with this area) will ever need to be expanded. <br /> <br />Building Official Scherbel <br />stated that the AV room is large. <br /> <br />City Administrator Klaers <br />indicated that staff would consult with the person who runs the AV <br />equipment before proceeding with the project. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant <br />inquired what the costs would be for this project. <br /> <br />Building Official Scherbel <br />stated that he is waiting for two bids to be submitted. He estimated <br />the expense would be less than $5,000. <br /> <br />The consensus among the Council is to have staff email the cost, plus the price of the television, <br />to all of the Councilmembers once the numbers are known. <br /> <br /> <br />B.Utility Billing Discussion <br /> <br />City Administrator Klaers <br />stated that a resident appeared at the February 25, 2013, City Council <br />meeting to discuss his utility bill and file a formal appeal, and it was Council consensus at that <br />time to bring the item back for further discussion at a work session. <br /> <br />City Administrator Klaers <br />explained that staff has called the resident several times but he did <br />not return the call. He asked what the Council would like to do since the resident did not appear <br />tonight to discuss his bill. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.