06-10-13-WS - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—JUNE 10, 2013 2 Mayor Grant questioned if the width of the bridge would change. Public Works Director Maurer explained that MnDOT and the County were evaluating a three lane bridge. He commented that the plans were not yet in final design, but that three lanes with a 10 foot pedestrian lane on one side of the bridge is being proposed. Mr. Thomas explained that if the lane configurations were to change, minor adjustments could be made to the Phase I plans. He stated that it was his intent to work within the existing curb lines. Mayor Grant asked what benefit would be received relative to cost. Mr. Thomas commented that businesses and residents in the area would now have a corridor that was clearly striped with better access for both vehicles and pedestrians. Further discussion ensued regarding the traffic flow around the Commers, Davidson, and Flaherty's properties along with which medians and turn lanes should remain in place. Mr. Thomas stated that at this time, the plan showed a dedicated lane into the Davidson property. The Council was not in favor of this turn lane as it would adversely impact bicycle traffic. Mr. Thomas indicated that the concept plan was not perfect, but it would accomplish a lot for improving traffic and pedestrian movements, with the least impacts and expense. He noted that the plan will continue to evolve and expand into the future. Councilmember Holmes questioned if the business owners along the corridor have discussed assessments for boulevard trees. Mr. Thomas explained that this has been discussed in general terms. He told the business owners there would be some upfront costs noting the distribution of the costs was yet to be determined. Councilmember Holden inquired what portion of the project costs the County would pay. Public Works Director Maurer commented that the County would be responsible for the roadway seal coat, a portion of the sidewalk construction, median construction, and most of the signal work. He stated that the County saw the traffic benefits to the proposed enhancements along the corridor. Mayor Grant requested further information on the Carroll's easement. Mr. Thomas stated that the City was made aware of an easement on Carroll's property that could be used for a sidewalk. This was investigated further and after reviewing the documents, two easements were found. The first was on the west side of the property which was titled as a sidewalk and utility easement. The second easement was described in the same manner and continues into the roadway. Until the Carroll's parcel is redeveloped, it would be difficult to negotiate any changes to the easements. Through the Phase I plan, he hoped to have business access driveways consolidated. However, many of the business owners were not interested in shared driveway accesses.