Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – April 7, 2010 5 <br /> <br />3.A. Planning Case 09-022; Variance; 1563 Edgewater Avenue; Mr. and Mrs. Ranallo – Not <br /> a Public Hearing (continued) <br /> <br />Avenue based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the <br />five conditions in the April 7, 2010, planning case report. <br /> <br />Commissioner Scott stated the proposed home would be an added feature to the <br />neighborhood and is keeping with the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Chair Larson stated since the home had been designed for this lot it could have been <br />designed to meet all the setbacks. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zimmerman stated the applicants had done a lot of work to fit the design of <br />the proposed home within the footprint of the existing home and the setbacks are <br />consistent with the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Commissioner Modesette agreed with Commissioner Zimmerman. <br /> <br />The motion was called to a vote. <br /> <br />The motion carried unanimously (7-0). <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />B.Planning Case 09-023; Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Zoning Code <br />Amendment; 1296 County Road F; Estate of George J. Reiling – Public Hearing <br /> <br />City Planner Beekman stated the applicant is requesting a Zoning Code amendment to <br />make existing non-conforming communications towers conforming so that additional <br />antennas, at a height greater that 75-feet, may be placed on them. The applicant is also <br />requesting a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Amendment to Planning Case 72-024 for the <br />tower at 1296 County Road F to allow up to 21 antennas to be located, replaced, or <br />relocated on the tower without the need for additional CUP Amendments. The CUP <br />amendment is contingent upon approval of the Zoning Code amendment. She provided <br />background information and stated the Planning Commission must make a finding as to <br />whether or not the proposed zoning code amendment meets the goals of the City and if <br />the conditional use permit is in conformance with the zoning code. Staff offers the <br />following sixteen findings for consideration: <br />General Findings: <br /> <br />1.The property is 2.76 acres and is zones I-1: Limited Industrial District. <br /> <br />2.The antenna tower was constructed in 1972 in planning case 72-024. <br /> <br />3.The antenna tower is 240 feet tall. <br /> <br />4.The existing conditional use permit provides for seven dish antennas at specific <br />heights as noted in the CUP. <br /> <br />5.Zoning Code changes after 1972 have made the tower a legal, non-conforming <br />structure because it is the primary use of the site and exceeds the 75-foot height <br />limit. <br /> <br />6.The antenna tower has 30 antennas as listed in the structural analysis report <br />provided in the January 27, 2010, Ulteig report. <br />