Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – October 3, 2012 7 <br />-Security <br />City Planner Meagan Beekman offered the following nine findings of fact for review: <br />1.The height of the fence exceeds the maximum allowable height in the front yard <br />structural setback. <br />2.A three foot fence is allowed in the proposed location without a site plan review <br />process. <br />3.The proposed fence will not damage the abutting property. <br />4.The finished side of the fence will face the adjoining property. <br />5.The proposal does not improve the livability of the property. <br />6.The proposal does not improve the appearance of the property, as the proposed fence <br />location is not consistent with other properties in the area. <br />7.The proposal does not improve the security of the property, as a three-foot fence <br />would effectively provide security for the property. <br />8.There is a documented history of conflict between the applicant and the adjoining <br />property owners. <br />9.The proposal will not alleviate the conflict amongst the property owners as there are <br />other remedies available outside of erecting a 6-foot fence in the front yard. <br />City Planner Meagan Beekman stated the findings of fact for this Site Plan Review <br />support a recommendation for denial. If the Planning Commission wishes to make a <br />recommendation for approval, the findings of fact must be amended to reflect the reasons <br />for the approval. <br />Staff has received comments from four residents. Christine Pulzer called Staff today to <br />speak in favor of the proposal. <br />Commissioner Zimmerman asked about the findings of fact that the fence would not <br />resolve the conflicts with the neighbors. City Planner Meagan Beekman stated staff <br />reviewed this with the City Attorney and there are other remedies available to resolve the <br />conflicts. <br />Commissioner Stodola asked if shrubs or hedges could be planted. City Planner <br />Beekman stated some vegetation could be planted and could grow quite high however if <br />any of the vegetation were to grow on the neighbors property they would have the right to <br />cut the portion on their property. <br />Vice Chair Thompson asked if plantings can be done on the right-of-way. City Planner <br />Beekman stated plantings can be done in the right-of-way; however, it is subject to <br />removal if necessary. <br />Commissioner Holewa verified there are four houses on the cul-de-sac. City Planner <br />Beekman showed the location on the existing fences on the aerial view. <br />Ms. Beekman noted there is a 20 foot easement at the back of the property. <br />Mr. Matt Trites, 1850 Indian Place, stated the northern fence is not placed correctly on <br />the aerial view. It will not connect to anything. The southwest property line fence has a <br />gate. There are two trees planted on the property line, which will not be disturbed. <br />