Laserfiche WebLink
the addition would be in line with the existing setback of the home. The applicant feels that this <br />location and configuration of the garage has the least impact on the neighborhood. <br />The property is unique compared to most other properties because the 40 foot front yard setback <br />applies to the south, east, and west property lines. This is due to the property’s location along <br />the curve of Skiles Lane and adjacency to Snelling Avenue. If the lot were a traditional lot with <br />a side yard, no variance would be required. The grade change from the front to the back yard <br />would permit most of this addition to be located below grade and thus not be visible from Skiles <br />Lane. Because of this lot configuration, alternative locations for a two car garage that meets <br />building code are limited. <br />Staff did additional research and found that a 30 foot setback is common along Skiles Lane; <br />additionally, setback variances have been approved for other properties in the neighborhood <br />along Skiles Lane and Arden Place for similarly shaped lots. While the granting of previous <br />variance requests does not set a precedent for approval of this variance request, it does help <br />provide additional context to the neighborhood. A full survey of the neighborhood would be <br />needed to verify the exact setbacks of other lots. <br />Findings of Fact <br />Staff offers the following fifteen findings of fact for review: <br />General Findings <br />1.The lot depth and width exceed the minimum R-1 requirements. The lot size of 13,939 <br />square feet is nonconforming in the R-1 Zone. <br />2.The existing structure encroaches nine feet into the 40-foot front yard setback along <br />Skiles Lane. The structure meets all other R-1 setback requirements. <br />3.The proposed addition would encroach 24 feet into the front yard setback. <br />Approximately 480 square feet of the proposed addition would encroach into the front <br />yard setback, of this 96 square feet would be at-grade and visible from Skiles Lane. The <br />area of the addition outside of the setbacks does not require a variance. The proposed <br />addition would be in line with the existing home, and the portion visible from Skiles Lane <br />would step back with the existing structure. <br />4.The proposed addition does not encroach on the required setback along Snelling Avenue. <br />5.The existing and proposed lot coverage meets the R-1 Zone requirements. <br />6.The existing garage does not meet the ceiling height requirements of the Building Code, <br />thus the proposed garage would bring the property into greater conformance with modern <br />building code requirements. <br />7.The dwelling with the proposed addition would not exceed the 35 foot height limit. <br />8.Dwellings and garages are permitted structures within the R-1 Zone. <br />9.The existing dwelling and the proposed garage are outside of the 100-year flood plain, <br />wetlands, and easements. <br />City of Arden Hills <br />Planning Commission Meeting for March 6, 2013 <br />P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2013\PC 13-001 Wessberg Variance (Pending)\UPDATE - PC Report - Wessberg Variance.doc <br />Page 5 of 8 <br />