My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-19-10-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
02-08-10-R
>
01-19-10-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/4/2013 12:47:17 PM
Creation date
10/4/2013 12:47:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—JANUARY 19, 2010 12 <br /> LD Discussion of Support and Endorsing Proposed Legislation (continued) <br /> MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a <br /> motion to extend the meeting to 8:30 p.m. The motion carried unanimously <br /> iLL <br /> Mayor Harpstead noted that he signed a letter of support that was sent to Land O'Lakes. <br /> Councilmember Holden questioned if this was the same as an endorsement and wondered if the <br /> City should be doing this in the future. <br /> Councilmember Holmes indicated there may be actions that could be reviewed by the Council <br /> when legislation directly affected the City. <br /> Mayor Harpstead agreed with Councilmember McClung that some issues directly impact the <br /> residents of Arden Hills and the Council should take a stand. In other instances, the power of <br /> cities joining together could assist in powerful relationships to gain favor with MnDOT. He <br /> indicated he was not interested in putting this on the schedule to have the Council vote on this <br /> issue. <br /> Councilmember McClung stated a very informal policy could be written that if something <br /> strongly grabs the attention of a Council member, it could be brought to staff's attention for <br /> discussion at a worksession. <br /> Mayor Harpstead added that staff could bring items before the Council as well, if directly <br /> affecting the residents. <br /> Further discussion ensued regarding how the Council would review future requests. <br /> E. Recreation Budget Discussion <br /> Councilmember Holmes suggested this item be tabled to the next meeting since Recreation <br /> Manager Olson was not present. <br /> Mayor Harpstead felt that was a fair request. <br /> MOTION: Councilmember Holmes moved and Mayor Harpstead seconded a motion to <br /> table the Recreation Budget Discussion to the next meeting. The motion <br /> carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> F. Council Pay Schedule <br /> Councilmember Grant requested the Council be paid annually in a lump sum instead of a <br /> quarterly basis, if so desired. <br /> Councilmember Holmes had no objection, if left up to the Councilmember. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.