My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-21-13 Worksession
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
10-21-13-WS
>
10-21-13 Worksession
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/22/2013 9:27:00 AM
Creation date
10/22/2013 9:26:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
10-21-13 Worksession
General - Type
10-21-13 Worksession
Category
10-21-13 Worksession
Date
10/21/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AGENDA ITEM <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />DATE: October 21, 2013 <br /> <br />TO:Honorable Mayor and City Council Members <br /> <br /> <br />FROM: Patrick Klaers, City Administrator <br /> <br /> <br />SUBJECT: 2014-2018 CIP <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />The Finance Department has updated the proposed 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Plan <br />(CIP). This document is attached for you review. <br /> <br />During discussion of this updated 2014-2018 CIP, there are a few issues that I would like <br />for the Council to consider. These issues are also applicable to the discussion on uses for <br />the franchise fee revenues. <br /> <br />Street and Trail Maintenance <br />Within the overall CIP is the Permanent Improvement Revolving (PIR) fund. The PIR <br />fund is where the street and park related expenditures are located. Each year the Council <br />transfers $200,000 from the General fund (basically tax revenues) to the PIR fund. The <br />historic intent for this transfer was to help finance the City share of the Pavement <br />Management Program (PMP) projects (for residential projects, the City share is 50% of <br />the cost of the streets). However, included in the PIR fund are expenditures for street <br />crack sealing and sealcoat work and for trail rehabilitation work and these two <br />expenditures equal approximately $200,000 per year. Accordingly, these annual <br />expenses directly offset the General fund transfer. From an organizational point of view, <br />these two activities should be in the General fund operating budget. <br /> <br />The above situation needs to be addressed in order to have the General fund budget for <br />streets and parks reflect actual annual operating expenses; and in order to have the <br />transfer of money to the PIR fund applied toward PMP projects. The suggestion for the <br />Council is to raise tax revenues, or to use franchise fees, or a combination of both. If a <br />franchise fee program is established, I would rate solving this CIP and Operating Budget <br />problem as a top priority. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.