Laserfiche WebLink
Ryan Streff October 4, 2013 <br />City of Arden Hills Page 3 <br />To establish a baseline condition that does not include any construction impacts, historical peak <br />hour and daily traffic volume information, provided by the Minnesota Department of <br />Transportation (MnDOT), was reviewed. This data was compared to <br />intersection counts, which were then modified accordingly to reflect year 2013 non-construction <br />conditions within the study area. <br /> <br />In addition to the intersection counts, observations were completed to identify roadway <br />characteristics within the study area (i.e. roadway geometry, posted speed limits, and traffic controls). <br />Currently, County Road E is primarily a three-lane roadway west of Snelling Avenue and a five-lane <br />roadway to the east. The posted speed limit along County Road E within the study area is 35 miles <br />per hour (mph). Lexington Avenue is also a three-lane roadway, but has a 40 mph posted speed <br />limit, while Old Snelling is a two-lane roadway with a 45 mph posted speed limit. The remaining <br />study area roadways are two-lane roadways with 30 mph posted spe <br /> <br />Study intersections along County Road E at Pine Tree Drive, the Snelling Avenue West Ramps, and <br />the Snelling Avenue East Ramps are currently signalized. The County Road E/Old Snelling <br />intersection is unsignalized and has all-way stop control. The other study intersections are also <br />unsignalized, but have side-street stop control. The existing geometrics, traffic controls, and <br />volumes within the study area are shown in Figure 2. <br /> <br />Intersection Capacity Analysis <br />An existing intersection capacity analysis was completed to establish a baseline condition to which <br />future traffic operations could be compared. The existing study intersections were analyzed using a <br />combination of the Synchro/SimTraffic (Version 8.0) and Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) <br />software. Capacity analysis results identify a Level of Service (LOS) which indicates how well an <br />intersection is operating. Intersections are ranked from LOS A through LOS F. The LOS results are <br />based on average delay per vehicle, which correspond to the delay threshold values shown in <br />Table 1. LOS A indicates the best traffic operation and LOS F in <br />demand exceeds capacity. Overall intersection LOS A through D is generally considered acceptable <br />by drivers in the study area. <br />Table 1.Level of Service Criteria for Signalized and Unsignalize <br />Signalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection <br />LOS Designation <br />Average Delay/Vehicle (seconds) Average Delay/Vehicle (seconds) <br />A <br />B - - <br />C - - <br />D - - <br />E - - <br />F <br /> <br />