Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION –October 9, 201313 <br />Woodburn also expressed concern with Bethel’s future on the Pine Tree site and if additional <br />buildings would be constructed. <br />Pauline Richards, 3544 Glen Arden Road, stated she lived one block from Snelling Avenue and <br />County Road E. She found this intersection to be dangerous and thought the proposed use on the <br />Pine Tree property would further aggravate the traffic in this area. <br />There being no additional comment Chair Larson closed the public hearing at 8:35p.m. <br />Commissioner Holewa asked if Condition 5 needed to be amended prior to approval this <br />evening. <br />Chair Larson thought it would be reasonable for the Commission to amend this condition. <br />Commissioner Zimmerman agreed that Condition 5 should be amended to read “traditional <br />undergraduate programs”. <br />Commissioner Hames suggested traditional programs not be allowed on the Pine Tree campus <br />until the shuttle service was available. <br />Ms. Nelson explained adult classes would be offered at the Pine Tree site in Phase I. She <br />reported a shuttle service would not be in place until Phase II of the project when traditional <br />student programs were located on the Pine Tree campus. She estimated that Phase II of Bethel’s <br />plans would not begin until 2014 or 2015. <br />Commissioner Zimmerman questioned how Condition 5 should read. <br />Ms. Nelson suggested this condition read that no traditional undergraduate programs shall be <br />implemented on this site until a shuttle service is implemented between the main campus and <br />Pine Tree campus. <br />The Commission agreed to this language and directed staff to amend Condition 5. <br />Commissioner Holewamoved and Commissioner Zimmermanseconded a motion to <br />recommend approval of Planning Case 13-013for a Conditional Use Permit at 2 Pine Tree <br />Drivebased on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the 12 <br />conditions in theOctober 9,2013, report to the Planning Commission. The motion carried <br />unanimously (6-0). <br />C.Planning Case 13-0016;Variance;1226 Ingerson Road–Not aPublic Hearing <br />City Planner Streff stated the applicant has requested a two (2) variances for the proposed project <br />located at 1226 Ingerson Road. <br />1) The first variance is being requested to exceed the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) by 313 <br />square feet. <br />