Laserfiche WebLink
�e vf raadway �urban c�r nkral}. Table ��elow sur�.�mari�es ihe pat� separatian widths fram the <br />ro�dw�.y xecommended by the Bikew�y Manuai. <br />T�E+ie 3 <br />Path Sc aratir�n frvm Roa�wa <br />'T e c�f Ro��wa S ee�3 Li�it ' PH} . Se aration <br />�{} pP L�85 2� �t {cie�ira�Ie} <br />10 ft {m�nimum� <br />R�zral Sectian tnc� ciub) 45 or Greater 35 ft(desirable) <br />24 ft (tn�nimum} <br />Freew�.y 50 ft (minirnum} <br />� 3Q ar Less 5 ff�rninimurn� <br />3 ft (minimum, afpar�€ir�g �lle�w�d} <br />35 — 44l 5 ft (artinit�n.urn} <br />Urbari S�ctic�n {wit� c�rb) <br />45 c�r Cfreater 1 U ft(c�esicai�ie) <br />5 f� (r�inimum) <br />Fzeeway 50 �t {minimum} <br />'� Ta�le inforrn�tian prvvided by the Mr�/DC1T B�keway Facitity Design Manual <br />(3ther design consider�tic�ns such �s exact hvrizc�nt� and ve�zcal a.�ignm�.ents, geometri� design <br />rec}u�rements, and horizon€al clearan�es ar� nc�t al�le to be �eterrnined �vithout co,�p�eting � <br />tc�pograp�ic iield survey. These det�its will need to �e e�aluat�d and iz�el�zde� in ttze f�a� design <br />phas� afthe pro�ect. <br />The tir►aing of the lraii constructi�n will �e he�t accvmplis�ed w�en the adjac�nit roadway is <br />recansta-�,iet�d. This a�plies tc� �11 segments and in particular the seg�ent af trail from �tate Hi�hw�y <br />51 to Cc�unty Road E since the ro�way may be reE��i�t as an urb�n s�Gtivn instead of a rural sectivaa <br />anti tfie #�ail design can be adjusted ta t�atch the propo�ed roadway. <br />3.3 C�thc�r �arrsidercrt���s <br />Stor��. water anana�ernent infl�ences were alsQ cc�nsi�ered during the trail study far this carrido�. A <br />meetin�; was heici with the Rice Creek iT�'at�rshed District, and it w�s detern��ned ti�at a�il project <br />where the pa�ved s�.�rface is less than ten �`eet in w�dth a.na � a five fQt�t wide mi�imwn �egeiated <br />b�ffer strip will r�at i�i�ger any water qualify ar volume co�atrol requirer�e�z�,s. Ir� any area where �iae <br />pr+�ject does n�i meet thc�se ge�gdelines, that p€�rtion af the traii will be rec}uired tc� meet th� �listrict's <br />wa�er quali�y and vo�ume requiremen�s. The �it3rcesota PQllution Cvntral Agency's (MPCA) permi� <br />requirer�sents fgr cr�nstruction projects will generally be met with the same praetices required by the <br />Rie� Creek Watersh�d District. The �egetated b�aff�r strips that m�et the wa.tershed �districts <br />requ�rement� wili also t�e�t ti�e MPCA'� requirements for a majr��ity Qf the pra��ct w�ere the <br />cc�nstru�tion afinfiitrataaz� �asins or wet ponds is not feasibie. The c�sts fvrc�t�str�zctin� ir�fltra�ian <br />basiras vr wet ponds are not inelraded in this repart since the areas ih,at are feasible tor their <br />C3id St�elfin� AVet�t�e i Qtd High�,+�.y I{� Tr�i! Study, City of Arden H'slls <br />BM[ �'ro�}ect i�o. TtG.I{10325 <br />Page 3 <br />