My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-14-12-R Draft Minutes
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
06-25-12-R
>
05-14-12-R Draft Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2013 1:26:50 PM
Creation date
11/18/2013 1:26:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL— MAY 14, 2012 8 <br /> Councilmember Tamble asked how complete the project was to be, with respect to the recent <br /> redevelopment of Arden Plaza with Walgreens. He inquired how the Holiday Inn plan differed. <br /> City Planner Beekman discussed the redevelopment of Walgreens and Arden Plaza with the <br /> Council noting it was to be completed in phases and had a complete traffic circulation included. <br /> In addition, a landscaping plan and footprint of the building was included. She explained that the <br /> Holiday Inn request had a conceptual building planned for Lot 2. The final PUD would have to be <br /> amended when this parcel was ready for development. This was not the typical model for <br /> redevelopment of properties. <br /> Councilmember Holden noted the phasing of the project was date uncertain at this time. She <br /> questioned if a detailed phasing plan was provided by the applicant. <br /> City Planner Beekman indicated the applicant had not submitted a detailed phasing plan. She <br /> anticipated that Phase I would include Levels 1 and 2 of the building. Phase lI would include the <br /> third and fourth levels of the building. Phase III would involve the redevelopment of McGuire's <br /> and the banquet facilities. Phase IV would be the development of Lot 2. These phases were not <br /> identified by the applicant, but were Staff s interpretation of how the redevelopment would occur. <br /> Mayor Grant requested further information on the floor plan layout and where the one-bedroom <br /> units were located. <br /> City Planner Beekman commented there would be eight one-bedroom units on the first floor and <br /> 12 on the second floor. There would be another 20 one-bedroom units on the remaining two <br /> floors. <br /> Councilmember Holden asked if the right-in, right-out would meet the traffic needs after Lot 2 <br /> were developed. She questioned how the Council was to approve the development without <br /> knowing the final size of the proposed building and future traffic access needs. <br /> City Planner Beekman explained the right-in, right-out access was approved by the County for <br /> the proposed bank use which was 2,500 square feet in size. <br /> Councilmember Holden stated Lot 2 would then be allowed to be 2,500 square feet in size based <br /> on the County approval of a right-in, right-out access. <br /> Councilmember Tamble questioned how the development would proceed if another use were <br /> proposed for Lot 2. <br /> City Planner Beekman was uncertain how the County would respond to a different use. <br /> Councilmember Holden stated the right-in, right-out access was approved by the County after <br /> much discussion and determination on Mr. Davidson's part. <br /> Mayor Grant requested Staffs assessment on the traffic plan provided by the applicant. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.