Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION –December 4, 20135 <br />Commissioner Thompson <br />questioned what the height of the new garage would be. <br />City Planner Streff <br />explained that the new garage would be 12 feet –9 inches in height along <br />Lake Johanna Boulevard, which is the height ofthe existinggarage. <br />Commissioner Thompson <br />questioned if the proposed building materials for the garage would <br />match the house. <br />City Planner Streff <br />reported the homeowners would be updating the home to match the <br />proposed building materials that would be used on the garage. <br />Scott BarsnessOtogawa-Anschel Design and Build <br />,, explained how the proposed garage <br />would be refinished. He clarified that the lower portion of the garage would remain in place. <br />The structural concerns were with the second level. He noted a steel beam would be added for <br />support. The proposed building materials were then addressed. <br />Chair Larson <br />reported the applicant was obligated to match or complement the garage building <br />materials to the principle structure. He recommended the applicant review this matter further <br />with staff. <br />Commissioner Bartel <br />expressed concern with the proposed expansion of the garage given the <br />fact the property was on a lake lot. <br />Commissioner Zimmerman <br />appreciated the use of impervious pavers and that the rainwater <br />would be collected for landscapingpurposes. <br />Commissioner Stodola <br />stated the aging housing stock in Arden Hills would require updates <br />similar to what was being proposed by the applicant. She encouraged the Commission to be <br />flexible given the fact the City had a large number of non-conforming structure.She supported <br />the proposed design and improvements. <br />Commissioner Scottmoved and Commissioner Zimmermanseconded a motion to <br />recommend approval of Planning Case 13-020for a Varianceat3324 Lake Johanna <br />Boulevardbased on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the four <br />(4)conditions in the December 4,2013, report to the Planning Commission. The motion <br />carried unanimously (6-0). <br />Planning Case 13-021;PUD Amendmentand Site Plan Review;Boston Scientific; <br />B. <br />4100Hamline Avenue N–Public Hearing <br />Chair Larson <br />recused himself from discussion on this planning caseas his firm was the <br />architect for this project. <br />Community Development Intern Bachler <br />stated thatBoston Scientific is requesting a Master <br />Plan PUD (10th) Amendment and Site Plan Review to construct a 1,310 square foot addition to <br />the west side of Building 14, which is located in the northwest quadrant of the Boston Scientific <br />Campus. Building 14 is also identified on the campus Master Plan as Building N. The purpose of <br />