Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION—May 4, 2011 7 <br /> 4.A. Planning Case 11-007; PUD Concept Review Discussion; Select Senior Living; 1201 <br /> • County Road E. —Not a Public Hearing (continued) <br /> Chair Larson asked how this use for the Holiday Inn site fir into the overall Guiding Plan <br /> for the B2 District. <br /> City Planner Beekman the City adopted the Guiding Plan for the B2 District in October <br /> 2008. The Guiding Plan identifies the former Holiday INN parcel as a redevelopment <br /> opportunity and envisions a greater intensity of use on the site, including high density <br /> residential and retail. While not specifically stated in the Guiding Plan, it has been <br /> envisioned that the existing building on the site would be demolished at some point in <br /> order to make way for new development that aligned with the goals and principles for the <br /> B2 District. Current market conditions, as well as the solid construction of the existing <br /> building on the site, have made demolition of the building economically feasible from the <br /> standpoint of the private sector. There are many aspects of the current site layout of the <br /> parcel that conflict with the goals and principles of the Guiding Plan. The alignment of <br /> driveways and the location of the building make a future stop light location on County <br /> Road E challenging. The Guiding Plan calls for a greater intensity of use on the parcel, <br /> this is difficult to accomplish if the building remains in its current location and <br /> configuration. There are components of the current site layout, and opportunities for site <br /> improvements that are very much in line with the vision in the Guiding Plan. <br /> Opportunities exist to improve the exterior of the building and modernize the look of it as <br /> • well as significantly improve the landscaping and green space on the site. <br /> Chair Larson asked what the plans were for the remaining portion of the property. <br /> Mr. Davidson, TAT Properties, 2 acres will be retained by TAT Properties and will be <br /> developed based on a buyer for the property. The traffic expected by the proposed <br /> development is significantly less than what was expected by other development options <br /> considered for this property. TAT Properties will have traffic studies prepared that <br /> consider different types of businesses in this location so that consideration for the <br /> stoplight can be made. <br /> Commissioner Zimmerman stated he is in favor of this business plan and the proposed <br /> streetscape would be an asset for this area. <br /> B. Planning Case 11-009; Zoning Code Amendment Discussion; City of Arden Hills — <br /> Not a Public Hearing <br /> City PIanner Beekman stated at the February 22, 2011, Joint Planning Commission and <br /> City Council work session, one of the possible zoning code amendments discussed was a <br /> change to allow detached garages in the front yards of riparian lots. Staff was given <br /> direction to move forward with drafting possible language that would allow lakeshore lot <br /> owners to construct detached garages in their front yards under certain circumstances. <br /> She provided additional background information and stated Staff is requesting feedback <br /> from the Planning Commission on this language, and whether any revisions or additional <br /> standards are necessary. <br />