My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-05-13 PC Minutes
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
PC Minutes 2013
>
06-05-13 PC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2014 10:28:20 AM
Creation date
3/5/2014 10:28:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 5, 20136 <br /> <br />The proposed signage in the plan meets the requirements contained in Section 1325.05, Subd. 8 <br />of the Zoning Code. <br /> <br />Community Development Intern Bachler provided the Findings of Fact for review: <br /> <br />General Findings <br />1. The property is located in the B-2 Zoning District and in Sign District 4. <br />2. The Planned Unit Development at 1201 County Road E was approved by the City on <br />December 21, 2012 in Planning Case 12-019. The approved Planned Unit Development <br />did not include a master sign plan for the property. <br />3. The applicant is proposing an amendment to the approved PUD for a site-wide sign plan <br />that includes monument, wall, and auxiliary signage. <br />4. The City has adopted the Guiding Plan for the B2 District that includes design principals <br />and standards for signage in the area. <br />5. The proposed PUD Amendment is in substantial conformance with the requirements of <br /> <br />6. <br />Zoning Code. <br />7. Where the plan is not i <br />requested by the applicant due to the site conditions and land use mix unique to the <br />property at 1201 County Road E. <br />8. The PUD Amendment approval process allows for flexibility within the Cit <br />regulations through a negotiated process with a developer. <br />9. The signage plan would not have a negative impact on adjacent properties or the City as a <br />whole because they are consistent with the size and layout of the property on which they <br />would be located. <br /> <br />Community Development Intern Bachler recommended approval of Planning Case 13-009 for a <br />Planned Unit Development Amendment at 1201 County Road E. Staff recommends the <br />following five conditions be included with the approval: <br /> <br />1. The master sign plan shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as <br />amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as <br />determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning <br />Commission. <br />2. Freestanding signs shall be monument type ground signs with the copy resting on and <br />supported by a solid base of brick or rock-faced block in a color similar to or <br />complementary to the main structure on the site. The material of the base must extend at <br />least one-half way up the sides of the sign face. <br />3. Freestanding signs shall be located at least five (5) feet from any property line and shall <br />not project over the property line. <br />4. Wall signs shall be comprised of individual cut, back-lit letters and shall not extend more <br />than twelve (12) inches from the wall they are attached to. <br />5. In the event that the property at 1201 County Road E is subdivided to create a new parcel <br />abutting Lexington Avenue and County Road E, the new corner parcel will be permitted <br />only one freestanding sign and this sign shall be located on Lexington Avenue. Signage <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.