Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION December 4, 20138 <br /> <br />Todd Vanderburgh <br />, 1266 Wayne Ridge Drive, explained that his home abuts the Boston <br />Scientific campus. He expressed concern with the noise levels created at Boston Scientific. He <br />commented that the proposed addition would bring the facility closer to his home. He requested <br />that the noise levels at this site be reviewed. <br /> <br />Acting Chair Thompson <br /> explained that one of the conditions for approval did address the noise <br />levels on the Boston Scientific campus. <br /> <br />There being no additional comment Acting Chair Thompson closed the public hearing at 7:03 <br />p.m. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zimmerman <br /> understood the noise concerns at this property. It was his <br />understanding that the proposed reconfiguration could minimize the amount of noise coming <br />from the facility. This would greatly benefit the surrounding neighborhood. <br /> <br />Judd BraschRSP Architects <br />, , explained he has been working with Boston Scientific for a <br />number of years. He discussed the new equipment that would be added, noting it should be <br />quieter than existing equipment in the building. He explained that Boston Scientific would do its <br />best to contain and control noise within the new addition. He reported measurements were taken <br />earlier that week and the goal would be to reduce or meet the current levels. <br /> <br />Commissioner Bartel <br /> questioned how the noise levels were tested. <br /> <br />Mr. Brasch <br /> discussed how the noise levels were captured stating Boston Scientific was currently <br />within the MPCA limits. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zimmerman <br /> asked if sound-deadening panels would be used. <br /> <br />Mr. Brasch <br /> indicated a plenum would be used instead to reduce the sound levels. He noted the <br />ducts could be lined to muffle the sound as well. It was his opinion that the noise generated from <br />the site was coming from the roof-mounted units and the equipment located within the proposed <br />addition would not contribute to the noise concerns. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stodola <br /> inquired if the two new trees could be relocated to provide more <br />screening for the adjacent residents. <br /> <br />Mr. Brasch <br /> stated there was a bare spot on the landscaping plan, which led to the proposed <br />location. He did not object to moving the trees. <br /> <br />Acting Chair Thompson <br /> recommended that Mr. Brasch work with the neighbors to find the best <br />location for the two new trees. <br /> <br />Commissioner Bartel moved and Commissioner Zimmerman seconded a motion to <br />recommend approval of Planning Case 13-021 for a Planned Unit Development <br />Amendment and Site Plan Review at 4100 Hamline Avenue North based on the findings of <br />fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the five (5) conditions in the December 4, <br />2013, report to the Planning Commission. The motion carried unanimously (5-0) (Chair <br />Larson abstained). <br /> <br />