My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-10-14-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
03-10-14-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2014 1:04:45 PM
Creation date
3/7/2014 1:04:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 27, 201414 <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler <br /> discussed the transparency requirements and noted that the applicant <br />had not and was requesting flexibility. He reviewed the locations on the <br />building that would have spandrel glass windows. He reported that the proposed spandrel <br />windows would be a lighter gray than was used by Walgreens on Lexington Avenue. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant <br />questioned if 138 cars per hour was a reasonable estimate for this site. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler <br /> indicated that this was the estimated number of trips for the midday <br />and evening peak hours and that the proposed development was expected to generate between <br />1,000 to 1,500 daily trips. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant <br /> requested further information on how truck traffic would maneuver through the <br />site. He had concerns with the safety of truck traffic entering and exiting the site. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler <br /> discussed how trucks would maneuver through the site as it was <br />currently designed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden <br /> stated that the property owner would be leasing the building to <br />Goodwill; however, this lease could end and a different tenant could occupy the building. This <br />new tenant could have an impact on the traffic patterns and number of trucks entering and exiting <br />the site. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung <br /> expressed concern with the lack of screening on the north side of the <br />building. The lack of screening would give passing traffic a clear view of the donation area. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler <br /> commented that the landscaping for the site was not included on the <br />presented slides. He reviewed the landscaping plan in further detail with the Council. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant <br /> asked if staff considered higher screening around the loading dock. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler <br /> stated that this was not considered by staff, but if this was a concern <br />of the Council, an additional condition for approval could be added. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden <br /> asked if the proposed metal fence around the loading area met the B-2 <br />design standards. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler <br /> indicated that the proposed fence did meet the B-2 design standards. <br />He noted that the Planning Commission recommended the fence be painted to match the color of <br />the building façade. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden <br /> requested further comment from staff regarding Conditions 19 and 20 <br />as presented to the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler <br /> reported that these conditions were put in place to address the <br />concerns with how truck traffic could potentially block traffic or cause congestion along County <br />Road E and read as follows: <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.