My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-10-14-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
03-10-14-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2014 1:04:45 PM
Creation date
3/7/2014 1:04:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 10, 20147 <br /> <br />commented that there are a lot of unsafe areas in Arden Hills that are in need of trails. She <br />thanked the Council for considering the franchise fees. <br /> <br />Mark Kelliher <br />, 3712 Chatham Court,explained that he sent an email to the Council prior to this <br />meeting. He supports the recent improvements that have been made <br />opposes the regressive franchise fees. He suggests the Council raise property taxes instead. <br /> <br />John Naumann <br />, 1887 Stowe Avenue, stated that the parks in the City are a good thing and he <br />walks the trails of Schmidt Park often with his wife. He opposes the franchise fee and suggests <br />that a property tax levy be sought for additional park improvements. <br /> <br />John Van Valkenburg <br />, 1475 Royal Lane, reported that he serves on the PTRC. He supports the <br />franchise fee and improved parks and trails. He finds this to be a great opportunity to generate <br />additional resources from non-profits that benefit s his opinion that <br />the City needs to continue to invest in its parks and trail system to keep young families moving <br />into Arden Hills. He wants to see better connections between the City to improve safety for <br />students and young children. He sees the $60 franchise fee to be a minimal charge for the <br />numerous benefits that will be gained by the City. <br /> <br />Jason Kirchoff <br />, 2015 Thom Drive, expressed concern with the comments voiced by the Council <br />regarding the franchise fee. He encouraged the Council to change its perspective and make <br />further budget cuts before coming after the residents with additional fees. <br /> <br />, 1851 Gramsie Road, thanked the Council for holding an open discussion on the <br />franchise fees. He iesidents and students. <br />He stated it would improve connectability and safety. He supports the Council looking into <br />franchise fees for improved parks and trails. <br /> <br />Clifford Nimis, <br />1485 Glenhill Road, explained that he has lived in Arden Hills for 59 years. He <br />that the <br />City work to maintain what it has built and not further expand its facilities. The expansion of the <br />s and trails would increase long-term expenses. He did not want decisions made today <br />to burden the City in the future. He believes that now is not the time for additional park amenities <br />and facilities. <br /> <br />Vaughn Morin <br />, 1889 Grant Roadand trails, noting he lives on a trail. <br />However, he does not support the franchise fees. He suggests the City find funds in another <br />manner. He encouraged the City to find better ways to manage pet waste. <br /> <br />Ms. Aplikowski, , <br />1443 Bussard Court appreciated the conversation provided this evening. She <br />suggested that <br /> <br />Laura Myers <br />, 1383 Arden Place, opposed the franchise fee. She fears that all of the objections <br />raised this evening will not be considered by the Council, as was the case when her road (Arden <br />Place) was replaced. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.