My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-27-14-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
01-27-14-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2024 4:59:59 PM
Creation date
3/12/2014 1:13:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
1-27-14-Regular City Council Minutes
General - Type
1-27-14-Regular City Council Minutes
Category
1-27-14-Regular City Council Minutes
Date
1/27/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—JANUARY 27, 2014 11 <br /> with the remaining space divided between offices and a conference room, a donation processing <br /> area, and a drive-thru donation center. Parking areas would located behind and adjacent to the <br /> building and would be screened from view from County. Road E with landscaping and a <br /> decorative fence. The loading area would be on the backside of the building and would be <br /> enclosed with an eight-foot tall metal screen and gate. <br /> Associate Planner Bachler commented that light tan and grey brick would be used as the <br /> principal exterior building material. EIFS is proposed as an accent material and would be located <br /> along the upper portion of each fagade. Architectural features would extend along all four sides of <br /> the building. Specific design elements include parapets, corner columns, fagade articulation, <br /> awnings, windows, and variation in building materials. The proposed landscaping plan includes <br /> trees, shrubs, and perennial flowers planted throughout the site with a particular focus along <br /> Lexington Avenue. The applicant has submitted a project narrative and a complete plan set. <br /> Planning Associate Bachler reviewed the plan evaluation in detail with the Council. He <br /> explained that the Planning Commission reviewed Planning Case 13-017 at their regular meeting <br /> on January 8, 2014. A public hearing for this case was held at the meeting. At that time, no <br /> comments were submitted by residents or business owners in regard to the proposal. Staff has <br /> received several email inquiries about the project. The Planning Commission offers the following <br /> twelve (12) findings of fact for consideration: <br /> 1. The property is located in the B-2 General Business District. <br /> 2. The City has adopted the Guiding Plan for the B-2 District that outlines future <br /> development principals for the area. <br /> 3. The City has adopted additional Design Standards for the B-2 District within the <br /> Zoning Code. <br /> 4. The Master PUD at 1201 County Road E was approved by the City on December <br /> 21, 2012, in Planning Case 12-019. <br /> 5. The Master PUD Development Agreement requires that any significant changes to <br /> the approved plans be reviewed by the Planning Commission and approved by the <br /> City Council. <br /> 6. The applicant is requesting approval of an Amendment to the approved PUD to <br /> construct a 17,743 square foot retail building on the southeast corner of the <br /> property at 1201 County Road E. <br /> 7. The PUD process allows for flexibility within the City's regulations through a <br /> negotiated process with a developer. <br /> 8. The proposed PUD Amendment is in substantial conformance with the <br /> requirements of the Zoning Code and the B-2 District Design Standards. <br /> 9. Where the plan is not in conformance with the Zoning Code, flexibility has been <br /> requested by the applicant and/or conditions have been placed on an approval that <br /> would mitigate the nonconformities. <br /> 10. The property is located in Sign District 5. <br /> 11. The proposed PUD Amendment is in conformance with the requirements of Sign <br /> District 5 of the Sign Code. <br /> 12. The proposal is not anticipated to adversely affect the immediate area or the <br /> community as a whole. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.