Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 24, 20145 <br /> <br />used for City improvement projects. Due to the near zero balance in the Park Reserve Fund the <br />Council has been considering options to fund park and trail improvements. These options include <br />increasing property taxes, a park referendum, or franchise fees. After discussing these options, the <br />Council wanted to further explore franchise fees as a source for additional revenues. <br /> <br />City Administrator Klaers <br />stated that franchise fees are allowed by State law, and if approved, <br />the City would work with Xcel Energy to implement the program. It was noted that the Council <br />met with an Xcel representative three times in work sessions last year. He reported that a number <br />of cities in the metro area have instituted franchise fees to make up for the loss of LGA or to <br />finance capital, street, or park projects. He discussed the number of cities currently collecting <br />franchise fees, noting Mounds View, New Brighton, Shoreview, Forest Lake and Maplewood all <br />have franchise fees. <br /> <br />City Administrator Klaers <br /> reviewed the benefits of franchise fees noting that all utility <br />customers would be impacted which provides for a broader base of revenue collection for the City <br />than what is covered by property taxes. He reported that 43% of the City is made up of tax <br />exempt prop <br />commented that franchise fees were a flat fee and were not based on use. He discussed the <br />disadvantages of franchise fees stating that the fees can be viewed as regressive in nature and are <br />not tax deductible. <br /> <br />Director of Finance and Administrative Services Iverson <br />reviewed the differences between a <br />levy or property tax increase as compared to the proposed franchise fee. She then broke down the <br />percentages of residential, commercial and tax exempt properties in the City and explained how a <br />property tax increase would impact these properties. <br /> <br />City Administrator Klaers <br />explained that the proposed franchise fee rates would generate <br />$439,000 annually. Staff reviewed the franchise fee rates for commercial and industrial properties <br />along with how a property tax increase would more adversely impact property owners. He <br />commented that Xcel is willing to work with the City to establish fair and equitable franchise fee <br />rates for local business owners. He explained that if the franchise fees were approved by the <br />Council, the program would not go into effect until 2015. He noted that all of the information <br />presented this evening i <br /> <br />Mayor Grant <br /> opened the public hearing at 7:54 p.m. <br /> <br />Dorothy McClung <br />, 4370 North Snelling Avenue, noted that she has lived in Arden Hills for 42 <br />years and she is opposed to <br />diversify its revenue streams. She understood these were difficult discussions. While she enjoys <br />enities she does not believe these parks and trails are essential services. <br />She does not believe the City needs to charge its residents franchise fees in order to gain $439,000 <br />a year, every year going into the future. She does not feel it is wise to spend $500,000 for a mile <br />of trails. She recommended the City reconsider its needs and that the Council look to improve <br />Old Snelling prior to considering park improvements. She believes the franchise fees are <br />regressive and are not the right decision for Arden Hills. <br /> <br />