Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MARCH 10, 20143 <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung <br /> questioned the monthly maintenance fee for the Xcel lights. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Maurer <br /> reported the fee was $6.23 per light per month with the City <br />paying for the installation upfront. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes <br /> asked if the light height would be similar with either Xcel option. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Maurer <br /> stated both lights would be uniform in height at approximately <br />15 feet. He noted the lights along the corridor at this time were 30 feet in height. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes <br /> commented on the St. Anthony lights noting their corridor had lights <br />along only one side of the street. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Maurer <br /> indicated this was the case, and reported the County Road E <br />corridor would have lights staggered on both sides of the corridor every 100 feet. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung <br /> did not believe the fluted type of lights was a necessity. He suggested <br />the lights be 150 foot apart along the corridor and then staggered on either side of the street. This <br />would allow for one light every 75 feet. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Maurer <br /> explained that the new lights would be more efficient and would <br />greatly improve the light that was cast along the corridor. <br /> <br />Councilmember Werner <br /> indicated he visited the St. Anthony corridor and believed it looked <br />quite nice. He inquired if both Xcel light options were warrantied the same. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Maurer <br /> reported this was the case. <br /> <br />City Administrator Klaers <br /> requested further information on the cost differences between the <br />standard and decorative light. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Maurer <br /> commented the increase in cost was due mostly to the concrete <br />bases, more expensive poles and fixtures. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden <br /> wanted to see the corridor remain walkable and sustainable. She <br />supported the lights being closer if this meant the corridor would be safer for pedestrians. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant <br /> agreed stating he wanted the corridor to have visual appeal with trees, lighting, <br />medians, etc. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung <br /> supported the more economical Colonial style light with a non-fluted <br />pole with closer spacing. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden <br /> did not object to spending a little more given the fact this would serve <br />as the City corridor to make a statement. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant <br />agreed and discussed the lights and poles that were used by the City of Burnsville. <br />