Laserfiche WebLink
10. Mitigated Roadway Network Scenario Analyses <br />a. Minimum Development Scenario <br />Based on the results under the unmitigated scenario, the intersections that were failing and or had <br />failing movements were reevaluated with the mitigations stated previously. After mitigation all <br />intersections were operating at LOS D or better with no anticipated operational issues in the AM and <br />Table 9 <br />PM scenarios. The analysis results are presented in, and the total traffic turning movement <br />Figure T19 <br />volumes are shown in <br />Table 9 – 2030 Minimum Development Scenario Peak Hour Mitigation Analysis Results <br />2030 Baseline Min Mitigated AM2030 Baseline Min Mitigated PM <br />Intersection <br />LOSDelay (sec)LOSDelay (sec) <br />C21C29 <br />Old CR H and CR 96 <br />CR 96 and SB I-35W <br />C20C30 <br />Ramp <br />CR 96 and NB I-35W <br />B19C30 <br />Ramp <br />Round Lake Rd W and <br />C24C25 <br />CR 96 <br />Lakeshore Pl and CR <br />C28D39 <br />96 <br />CR 96 at US 10 NB <br />ANo ControlANo Control <br />Ramp <br />CR 96 and Property <br />C21C29 <br />Access <br />D38D44 <br />CR H and US-10 <br />B18B11 <br />CR H and SB I-35W <br />A4A9 <br />CR H and NB I-35W <br />C25C22 <br />CR I and SB I-35W <br />B13B13 <br />CR I and NB I-35W <br />A5A5 <br />CR I and Old Hwy 8 <br />CR I and N Fairview <br />A6A5 <br />Ave <br />b. Maximum Development Scenario <br />Based on results under the unmitigated maximum scenario, the failing intersections and or failing <br />movements were reevaluated with the mitigations previously described. After mitigation, all <br />intersections were operating at LOS D or better with no anticipated operational issues in the AM and <br />Table 10 <br />PM scenarios. The analysis results are presented in, and the total traffic turning movement <br />Figure T21 <br />volumes are shown in <br />. <br />TCAAP Traffic Analysis <br />Technical Memorandum19March 2014 <br />