My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-28-14-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
04-28-14-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2014 4:01:55 PM
Creation date
4/25/2014 4:01:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
267
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION –April 9, 20144 <br />16.The proposal does not conflict with the general purpose or intent of the Zoning Ordinance <br />or Comprehensive Plan for the City. <br />City Planner Streff <br />statedthatbased on the submitted plans and the findings of fact, staff <br />recommends approval of Planning Case 14-012 for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) <br />Amendment at 1887 Gateway Boulevard. Staff recommends the following five (5) conditions be <br />included with the approval: <br />1.That the project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended <br />by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by <br />the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City <br />Council. <br />2.That one (1) additional double walled storage tank shall be permitted on the property and <br />installed within the existing screening fence. <br />3.That the storage tank shall be completely concealed behind the screening fence. <br />4.That the storage tank shall meet all applicable Building, Fire and Mechanical Codes and <br />all County and MPCA regulations. The applicant shall obtain all required permits prior to <br />installation. <br />5.That the system to be installed shall comply with the odor, noise, and other applicable <br />Minnesota Pollution Control Agency regulations. Failure to comply with these <br />regulations may result in a revocation of a permit. <br />City Planner Streff <br />reviewed the options available to the Planning Commission on this matter: <br />1.Recommend Approval with Conditions <br />2.Recommend Approval as Submitted <br />3.Recommend Denial <br />4.Table <br />Chair Larson <br />openedthe floor to Commissioner comments. <br />Commissioner Thompson <br />questioned if the City monitored the odor or smell emitted from the <br />storage tanks. <br />City Planner Streff <br />commented this was not monitored by the City but would be complaint <br />based. However, the storage tankwould be inspected by the City when installed and if there <br />were any issues they would be addressed at that time. <br />Commissioner Zimmerman <br />asked if Hood Packaging would be hiring additional employees. <br />Ted Hegstrom <br />, Hood Packaging Corporation, stated his company would be hiring eight to ten <br />new employees. <br />Commissioner Jones <br />questioned if the new storage tankwould be tied into the existing systems. <br />Mr. Hegstrom <br />stated this was the case. <br />Chair Larson <br />opened the public hearing at 6:41p.m. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.