My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-12-14-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
05-12-14-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 2:06:07 PM
Creation date
5/9/2014 2:05:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
210
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MARCH 17, 20149 <br /> <br />reviewed by the Planning Commission are sign standard adjustments and this could be <br />streamlined by reviewing and making appropriate revisions to <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden <br /> recommended that the Commission consider the base size for <br />monument signs when the sign standards are reviewed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Bartel <br />wanted to see more structure in the sign code as this would provide further <br />guidance to the Commission when reviewing requests for sign standard adjustments. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung <br /> believed that even if the Sign Code was amended, there would always <br />be future applicants requesting additional signage. <br /> <br />Commissioner Bartel <br /> explained that by making the sign sizes proportionate to building sizes, this <br />would address a number of the requests for sign standard adjustments. He was in favor of <br />temporary sign requests being approved at a staff level. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jones <br />suggested that the number of tenants within a building and the size of the <br /> <br />parking lot be considered in the Sign Code. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden <br /> stated that the Sign Ordinance was developed due to the number of <br />large sign requests. She reported that Arden Hills did not want to become a neon lit community <br />with extremely large signs. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant <br /> reported that a level of flexibility could be written into the Sign Code, however, <br />there had to be a limit. He asked if the Council opposed the Planning Commission reviewing the <br />Sign Ordinance. <br /> <br />The Council supported the Commission moving forward with reviewing the Sign Ordinance. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant <br /> discussed LED lighting and recommended that the City and Planning Commission <br />get out in front of this issue. He suggested that staff speak with neighboring communities <br />regarding the regulation of LED lighting. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Thompson <br />agreed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden <br /> questioned which aspects of LED lighting would be reviewed by the <br />Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Thompson <br />indicated that this has yet to be determined by the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />City Planner Streff <br /> anticipated that this would include LED lighting on canopies and signs. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Hutmacher <br /> reported that more and more businesses were <br />changing light fixtures out from incandescent or fluorescent <br />She <br />neon-like manner as decorative accents. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.