My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-12-14-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
05-12-14-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 4:09:53 PM
Creation date
5/9/2014 4:09:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Future expenses to provide municipal services to TCAAP <br /> <br />Type of Expenditures <br /> <br />In general terms, the City TCAAP expenses can be separated out into a Capital category <br />and into an Operating category. <br /> <br />Capital Expenses are the one time, large expenditures such as trunk sewer and water lines <br />or storm sewer mains and ponds. Some of these capital expenses are best completed in <br />advance of the redevelopment projects and some are best completed concurrent with the <br />redevelopment activities. Municipal bonds are often used to finance capital <br />improvements and the bonds are typically repaid through assessments to benefitted <br />property owners. <br /> <br />I understand that financing the trunk utilities is a major concern for the City Council. <br />Article III of the Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) reviews this and some of the other City <br />financial issues. This Article III is attached for your reference. <br /> <br />Regarding the trunk sewer and water utilities, in brief, the plan is to assess 100% of the <br />costs out to the benefitted property owners. Originally, at the time of approving the JPA, <br />it was anticipated that the trunk utilities would be installed in phases from south to north <br />but it now looks like they will be installed all at once between 96 and the H/35W <br />intersections. While we know the likely financing method to recap <br />know the total cost of the trunk utilities, the per developable acre assessment amount, or <br />the repayment schedule. It is not really a case of if we will get repaid, but it is a case of <br />how and when we will get our money to pay off the bonds. <br /> <br />On the topic of the trunk storm sewer mains and ponds, these utilities can be looked at as <br />being both similar and yet different than the trunk sewer and water utilities. They are <br />similar in that they can be 100% assessed out; and they are different in that some of the <br />system (the pond especially) may be constructed in phases as development occurs. Also, <br />Rice Creek Watershed regulations are a major determining factor in the final size, <br />location and design of the storm water system. Right now it is very hard to tell where the <br />surface water management requirements end and the water feature amenity begins. This <br />utility is also more likely than the trunk sewer and water to be funded by methods other <br />than assessments (i.e. by storm water fees collect as development happens). <br /> <br />Concerning park development, the City should be able to acquire all of the desired land <br />for parks through the park dedication/platting process, but we may not get enough funds <br />for the park development and ponsibility to fund part of the park <br />improvements. Funding options to finance the park improvements, other than using park <br />dedication money or City reserves (PIR fund), are limited. <br /> <br />With reference to the private developer requesting public improvement for their <br />subdivisions, these localized capital improvements can be funded by the City and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.