My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-17-14-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
03-17-14-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/2/2024 7:02:32 AM
Creation date
5/15/2014 10:28:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
3-17-14-WS Minutes
General - Type
3-17-14-WS Minutes
Category
3-17-14-WS Minutes
Date
3/17/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—MARCH 17, 2014 3 <br /> Councilmember Holden requested further information on what would be included in the scope <br /> of the infrastructure and feasibility studies. <br /> Ms. Engum explained that the following categories would be addressed within the infrastructure <br /> plan: transportation, mass grading plan, utilities, water and sanitary sewer, stormwater, wetlands <br /> and platting. She noted that the feasibility study would meet the Chapter 429 (assessments) <br /> requirements. <br /> Councilmember Holmes asked who the County would be assessing for roadway and utility <br /> improvements. <br /> Ms. Engum reported that the assessments would be passed along to future landowners. <br /> Mayor Grant questioned how the City would recover its costs. <br /> Stacie Kvilvang, Ehlers &Associates,reviewed how the City could recover its costs. <br /> Councilmember McClung inquired if the water feature would be addressed through the <br /> infrastructure study. He explained that a great deal of information would be needed before he <br /> could make an informed decision regarding the water feature. <br /> Public Works Director Maurer stated that the water feature would be addressed in the <br /> infrastructure study. He understood the Council's concerns with the water feature and explained <br /> staff would continue to work with consultants on this issue before any final decisions were made <br /> regarding this amenity. <br /> Councilmember Holden asked when the Master Plan had to be approved. <br /> City Administrator Klaers indicated that the Master Plan should be approved this summer in <br /> order for the City to move forward with the Policies and Regulations. The goals for the water <br /> feature should be able to be addressed by that time. <br /> Further discussion ensued regarding the water feature. <br /> i <br /> Public Works Director Maurer understood that the Council wanted the water feature to hold <br /> water and be a positive amenity for the area. Staff would need to investigate how much land <br /> would be required to ensure the water feature meets the RCWD requirements, wetlands laws, and <br /> Council's goals. <br /> Mayor Grant questioned what direction the County was seeking from the Council this evening. <br /> Ms. Engum explained that the County was hoping the City would agree to enter into a cost <br /> sharing agreement per the Joint Powers Agreement to share in the stormwater study. <br /> Councilmember Holden asked if the water from the groundwater treatment process the Army <br /> operates on TCAAP would be analyzed through the RFP in terms of its potential use for the water <br /> feature or a geo-thermal system. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.