Laserfiche WebLink
elevation of 883 msl). They identified 15 plant species: 8 rooted submergent species; 4 <br />emergent species; and, 3 floating species. Nine of the species they observed rank as excellent to <br />good waterfowl foods (e.g., slender and softstem bulrush, chara). The Service didnot conduct <br />quantitative vegetation surveys for nearly 30 years after contaminants were discovered in the <br />early 1980s. Recent observations by Refuge staff found 10species of submergent plants and 14 <br />species ofemergent plants.Coontailwas the dominant submergent species and cattailwas the <br />dominat emergent species. Noteably, cattail was present in less than 20% of the basinsampling <br />locations. (USFWS 13).White water lilly was found in about 35% of the sampling locations. <br />Waterfowl migration surveys conducted on Round Lake from 1975 through 1978 routinely <br />recorded large flocks of waterfowl numbering between 1,000and9,000individuals.The most <br />abundant species were diving ducks (e.g., ring-necked duck, scaup, merganser, bufflehead,coot) <br />with slightly fewer dabbling ducks (e.g., American widgeon, mallard) (Sherburne National <br />Wildlife Refuge field reports). Round Lakewaterfowl observations during 2010,2011, and <br />2012fallmigration showed that use of the lake is variable across the migration period. Numbers <br />of waterfowl observed on the lake at any one time ranged from a few hundred to a few thousand <br />(USFWS 2010,2011,2012).Diving ducks were more abundant than dabbling ducks. In 2012, <br />Round Lake had disproportionately high duck use (more than 10 times) compared to nearby <br />waterbodies. Diving ducks used Round Lake in higher proportions than nearby waterbodies. <br />Following the remediation of contaminants in the Round Lake basin, water management <br />activities on the Round Lake Unit will focus on maintaining healthy emergent and submergent <br />plant communitiesas well as maintaining water quality. Attaining these habitat goals will <br />provide a plant and animal food base and suitable cover to support not only habitat requirements <br />for waterbirds in migration but also the annual lifecycle needs of several migratory and resident <br />wildlife species.This will require active water management. <br />There are some key elevations and concepts related to water level management. <br />At an elevation of 892.0 msl water starts to cause damage to adjacent properties. This <br />could be characterized as a “maximum” water elevation, although it is possible that <br />runoff from significant rainfall events may cause this elevation to be exceeded. <br />An elevation of 890.0 msl is the historical “normal” water level for the lake(Anon. <br />1947). This elevation is a likely target for water elevations to maximize use of emergent <br />vegetationbydabbling ducks during fall migration. At this elevation we would expect <br />about 6 –7% of the lake to have emergent vegetation. <br />The sill of the existing water control structure is887.0 msl. This would be a likely <br />maximum “draw down” elevation because water levels cannot be movedlowerthan this <br />without special techniques, such as pumping or siphoning.Historical Round Lake <br />observations have recorded water levels as low as 885 –886 msl due to evaporation <br />during natural “droughts.” Prior to the Service’s decision to hold water levels in Round <br />Lake highdue to the contaminated sediments, water levels were regularlytargeted to this <br />887.0 levelfor management purposes.Based on recent bathymetry informationshown in <br />Table 1(Wenck2010),at an elevation of 887.0msl, 90 % of the basin would still be <br />covered with water. <br />8/6/2013 10 USFWS RLMP <br />