Laserfiche WebLink
Sewer pipes connecting TCAAP to Round Lake that originally contaminated the lake were <br />sealed in the 1990’s. Becausethere is no public or private access to the lake, the contamination <br />at Round Lake poses only an ecological risk and was not a priority for immediate action. The <br />sediment contamination, however, must be addressed and a remedy approved prior to TCAAP’s <br />removal from the NPL.As the responsible party, the U.S. Army must pay for any required <br />remedy. <br />2011 Feasibility Study <br />The Army has proposed a No Action remedy in which contamination is mitigated through the <br />restriction of public and private access to thelake. The EPA has not approved a No Action <br />remedy because itdoes not address the ecological damage. Also, the EPA and MPCA are <br />concerned that a significant drought could lower the lake’s water level, similar to what has <br />occurred at White Bear Lake in recent years, so that the sediment layer is exposed. If the <br />sediment layer is exposed and dried, particles of lead or other contaminants could become <br />airborne and affect human health. Little new sediment accrues on the lake, so contaminants are <br />still inthe top layer of sediment on the lake’s bottom. <br />Prior to identifying a remedy for Round Lake, a feasibility study must be drafted and approved. <br />The feasibility study will define the problem and identify potential remedies including cost <br />estimates for those remedies. Although feasibility studies have been drafted by the Army in the <br />past, prior draft feasibility studies have not been approved by the EPA. <br />After the most recent draft feasibility study was completed in April 2010, the MPCA and the <br />EPA required the Army to do additional testingwhich was completed in January and February <br />2011.An agencymeeting is scheduled for June 2011 to discuss the results of the recent <br />sampling. The next draft of a feasibility study is expected to be completed in Fall2011 at the <br />very earliest. Public involvement usually occurs after the feasibility study and prior to the <br />planning phase. In this case, however, due to the high level of citizen interest, a public meeting <br />will likely be scheduled prior to the feasibility studybeing finalized. <br />Potential Remedies for Sediment Contamination <br />Options for a remedy vary from No Action to dredging the entire lake. Options such as installing <br />a cap of manmade or natural materials are also possible. The eventual remedy selected may <br />utilize a combination of remedies such as taking no action on parts of the lake, and installing a <br />cap or dredging in other areas. <br />If health risks are removed, the USFWSwould like to manage the lake so that it might be open to <br />the public for activities such as fishing and bird watching. USFWS may want to occasionally <br />draw down the water level in the lake by a foot or two to allow growthof vegetationin shallow <br />areas. Vegetation would filter storm water runoff and provide wildlife habitat. The lake’s depth, <br />up to 26 feet at some locations, ensures that the lake will always have open water. <br />Residents expressed concerns that the lake couldbecome a wetland with little open water. They <br />were concerned that dredging the lake could stir up sediment and that any activity on the lake <br />could be harmful for wildlifeincluding turtles and bald eagles which have a nest on Round Lake. <br />City of Arden Hills <br />