Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION May 7, 2014 2 <br /> <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler <br /> provided the Findings of Fact for review: <br /> <br />1. A Master PUD was approved for 4100 Hamline Avenue North in Planning Case #02-025. <br />2. The proposed 730 square foot addition to Building 10 was not included in the approved <br />Master Plan and an amendment to the PUD is therefore required. <br />3. The Master PUD requires that a Site Plan Review be applied for prior to the construction of <br />any building or addition. <br />4. The property is located in the I-1: Limited Industrial District. <br />5. The proposal is in conformance with the zoning and design standard requirements for the I-1: <br />Limited Industrial District. <br />6. <br /> <br />7. The proposal is not expected to exceed noise limits set by the Minnesota Pollution Control <br />Agency. <br />8. The proposal will not adversely impact the surrounding neighborhood or the City as a whole. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler <br /> stated based on <br />the submitted plans and findings of fact, staff <br />recommends approval of Planning Case 14-015 for a Planned Unit Development Amendment and <br />Site Plan Review at 4100 Hamline Avenue North. Staff recommends the following three (3) <br />conditions to be included with the approval: <br /> <br />1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the <br />conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City <br />Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. <br />2. A PUD Amendment drafted by the City Attorney shall be executed prior to the issuance of a <br />building permit. <br />3. The Master PUD Amendment and Site Plan Review shall automatically expire and become <br />void one (1) year after the date on which the Council granted such approval if work on the <br />project has not begun. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler <br /> reviewed the options available to the Planning Commission on this <br />matter: <br /> <br />1. Recommend Approval with Conditions <br />2. Recommend Approval as Submitted. <br />3. Recommend Denial <br />4. Table <br /> <br />Vice Chair Thompson <br /> opened the floor to Commissioner comments. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Thompson <br /> opened the public hearing at 6:57 p.m. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Thompson <br /> invited anyone for or against the application to come forward and make <br />comment. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Thompson <br />There being no additional comment closed the public hearing at 6:58 <br />p.m. <br /> <br />