Laserfiche WebLink
Site/ <br />Quarter <br />NameTwpRangeSectionAcres <br />Section <br />Inventory # <br />RA-AHC-014General Purpose Storage (Building 190)30239SW-SE <br />Peroxide Resinate Cake Drying House <br />RA-AHC-01530239SW-NE <br />#1 (Building 192A) <br />Peroxide Resinate Cake Drying House <br />RA-AHC-01630239SW-NE <br />#1 (Building 192B) <br />RA-AHC-017Office Building (Building 199)30239SW-NE <br />RA-AHC-035Sub/SWIT Station (Building 567A)302316NW-SE <br />RA-AHC-036Sub/SWIT Station (Building 567B)302316NW-SE <br />RA-AHC-037Lumber Shed (Building 717)30239SW-SE <br />RA-AHC-038General Purpose Storage (Building 908)30239SW-SE <br />RA-AHC-039General Purpose Storage (Building 909)30239SW-SE <br />RA-AHC-040General Purpose Storage (Building 961)302316SW-SE <br />In previous site investigations, the Trap Shooting Area (21RA0022) was found to contain a pre-contact American <br />Indian habitation/resource procurement site of approximately 0.3 acres. It sits near a western slope of Rice <br />Creek in the Rice Creek Corridor, an area undisturbed by plowing or by the grading and filling historically <br />conducted at the TCAAP site. It sits just outside of the AUAR study area, within the county park land. Artifacts <br />found at the site include pottery and lithics. The other five archaeological sites identified in the SHPO file search <br />were previously evaluated as part of the 2011 Environmental Assessment prepared by the General Services <br />Administration (GSA) for thesame TCAAPstudy area. The archaeological investigations concluded that none of <br />these sites were eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The State Historic <br />Preservation Office (SHPO) concurred with this determination, as captured in a Memorandum of Agreement <br />signed in 2010. Based on these previous findings, no impacts to archaeological properties are anticipated as a <br />result of the development of the AUAR study area. <br />In the same 2011 EA, six World War II-era structures on the TCAAP site that were considered eligible for <br />inclusion on the NRHP were expected to be demolished . The documentation performed on those six buildings <br />met the requirements for Section 106 compliance, and the Memorandum of Agreement states that the GSA <br />adequately addressed and satisfied their obligations to comply with Section 106 of the National Historic <br />Preservation Act. All but one building within the AUAR study area were removed in 2013, and the remaining <br />building (#502) is set to be demolished in 2014. Thus, there will be no structures remaining on the site and no <br />impacts to historic/architectural properties will occur from the development of the AUAR study area. <br />15.V <br />ISUAL <br />D.D <br />ESCRIBE ANY SCENIC VIEWS OR VISTAS ON OR NEAR THE PROJECT SITEESCRIBE ANY PROJECT RELATED <br />.D <br />VISUAL EFFECTS SUCH AS VAPOR PLUMES OR GLARE FROM INTENSE LIGHTSISCUSS THE POTENTIAL VISUAL <br />.I,,. <br />EFFECTS FROM THE PROJECTDENTIFY ANY MEASURES TO AVOID MINIMIZE OR MITIGATE VISUAL EFFECTS <br />The structures within the AUAR study area have been or will be demolished prior to construction of the AUAR <br />study area. Building heights under the proposed development scenarios would range from one to six stories in <br />the larger part of the site and up to eight stories within the smaller site area north of Rice Creek. The proposed <br />redevelopment would occur in an urbanized area, surrounded by multiple-lane highways on the south and west <br />(across which are residential, church, and commercial properties), AHATS to the east, and Rice Creek North <br />Regional Trail and a MnDOT facility to the north. Lighting requirements for future development will be outlined in <br />the forthcoming Development Regulations and Policies for the site. <br />June 2014– Final AUAR21 <br />