Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL –MAY 27, 20143 <br />8.The existing garage would be converted into living space and the existing driveway would <br />be removed if a variance is granted. <br />9.The proposed structure and landscaping coverage are within the zoning district <br />requirements. <br />10.The dwelling with the proposed addition would not exceed the 35 foot height limit. <br />11.Single Family Dwellings are permitted structures within the R-1 Zoning District. <br />12.The existing dwelling and the proposed garage are outside of the 100-year flood plain, <br />wetlands, and easements. <br />13.The property directly east of the subject property located at 1834 Venus Avenue <br />encroaches into the secondary front yard setback along Rolling Hills Road approximately <br />fifteen (15) feet. <br />Variance Findings: <br />14.The proposal is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as the <br />Ordinance generally allows flexibility for unique parcels and situations when impacts to <br />surrounding properties are minimized. <br />15.The proposal is consistent with the Arden Hills Comprehensive Plan as it allows the <br />reasonable use of residential property. <br />16.Single family dwelling are permitted and a reasonable use within the R-1 Single Family <br />Residential Zoning District. <br />17.The lot has rather unique characteristics for a corner lot within the City. The property is <br />situated on a corner lot, of which only one of the right-of-ways, Venus Avenue, consists of <br />an improved surface. The right-of-wayknown as Rolling Hills Road along the east side of <br />the property is unimproved and is used for trail purposes only. There are no plans at this <br />time to extend or improve this right-of-way. <br />18.The proposed addition would be visible from neighboring properties; however, the <br />addition would not be inconsistent in terms of setbacks and lot coverage requirements for <br />typical non-corner lots. The property owner would match the materials used for siding and <br />roofing to the existing dwelling, which should minimize the impacts on surrounding <br />property owners. <br />19.The proposed addition is unlikely to have negative impacts to the property or to the <br />neighborhood as a whole. Based on the proposed setbacks the property would function as a <br />typical non-corner lot within the R-1 Single Family Residential District. The trail that has <br />been constructed within the right-of-way of Rolling Hills Road is not likely to be affected <br />by the proposed addition. <br />20.The proposed plans and variance request for the addition to the single family dwelling <br />does not appear to be based on economic considerations alone. <br />City Planner Streff <br />reported the findings of fact for this variance request support a <br />recommendation for approval. However, if the City Council chooses to make a recommendation <br />for denial, the Findings of Fact would need to be amended to reflect the reasons for the denial.He <br />indicated the Planning Commission reviewed Planning Case 14-014 and recommends approval <br />(5-1) of the variance request for the property located at 1850 VenusAvenue, based on the findings <br />of factand the submitted plans as presented in the May 27, 2014, Report to the City Council, as <br />amended by the following seven (7) conditions: <br />