Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MAY 19, 20145 <br /> <br />City Administrator Klaers <br /> indicated that based on the past development on TCAAP, the City <br />has about 4,500 SAC credit units available. However, the chances of TCAAP developing to that <br />land use level is remote when looking at the maximum AUAR zoning scenario generating only <br />3,325 units. He reported that it would be more likely that the site will generate 2,200 SAC credit <br />units. The Council will have to consider how dense it wants to develop the TCAAP site. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant <br /> discussed the expense for storm water ponding. <br /> <br />Ms. Kvilvang <br /> explained two ways, developer fees or assessments, that the City could be <br />reimbursed for the storm water ponding expenses. <br /> <br />Heather Worthington <br />, Ramsey County Deputy County Manager, provided the Council with a <br />financial presentation that was made to the County Board a week ago regarding TCAAP. She <br />discussed the number of developable acres as being 347. She explained how this number would <br />be broken down between the various uses based on the current Master Plan. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden <br /> commented that the bar chart was quite difficult to read. <br /> <br />Ms. Worthington <br />apologized and explained the chart in further detail with the Council. <br /> <br />Mr. Ruff <br /> reported that the County has the most concern with the storm water and mass grading <br /> <br />expense at this time. <br /> <br />Ms. Worthington <br /> discussed the sources available for financing between the City and the County <br />based on the JPA. She reported that the County has not assumed any type of financing. She then <br />reviewed where resources could come from. She reiterated that the proposed numbers were for <br />discussion purposes and were not final numbers. She noted that the more fees that are charged <br />for TCAAP property, the more unattractive the property will become in the market place. <br /> <br />Mr. Ruff <br /> stated that based on the current model, if the County does not receive $7-8 million in <br />grants, the project will be in deficit. He anticipated that residential land will be at about $4.00 <br />per square foot and commercial land will be at $6.00 per square foot. He explained that the <br />residential land would be sold over six to seven years while commercial property would be sold <br />over the next 15 years. He stated that inflation may or may not happen over that time. <br /> <br />Ms. Worthington <br /> indicated that the County has been trying to be as conservative as possible <br />when estimating expenditures and revenues. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden <br /> hoped that the land value will be higher once the development is up <br />and running. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes <br /> requested clarification on the difference between assessments and fees <br />that will be charged to the land. <br /> <br />Mr. Ruff <br /> provided the Council with a definition on both of these terms. <br /> <br />