Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MAY 27, 20147 <br /> <br />15. The proposal is consistent with the Arden Hills Comprehensive Plan as it allows the <br />reasonable use of residential property. <br />16. Single family dwelling are permitted and a reasonable use within the R-1 Single Family <br />Residential Zoning District. <br />17. The lot has rather unique characteristics for a corner lot within the City. The property is <br />situated on a corner lot, of which only one of the right-of-ways, Venus Avenue, consists of <br />an improved surface. The right-of-way known as Rolling Hills Road along the east side of <br />the property is unimproved and is used for trail purposes only. There are no plans at this <br />time to extend or improve this right-of-way. <br />18. The proposed addition would be visible from neighboring properties; however, the <br />addition would not be inconsistent in terms of setbacks and lot coverage requirements for <br />typical non-corner lots. The property owner would match the materials used for siding and <br />roofing to the existing dwelling, which should minimize the impacts on surrounding <br />property owners. <br />19. The proposed addition is unlikely to have negative impacts to the property or to the <br />neighborhood as a whole. Based on the proposed setbacks the property would function as a <br />typical non-corner lot within the R-1 Single Family Residential District. The trail that has <br />been constructed within the right-of-way of Rolling Hills Road is not likely to be affected <br />by the proposed addition. <br />20. The proposed plans and variance request for the addition to the single family dwelling <br />does not appear to be based on economic considerations alone. <br /> <br />City Planner Streff <br /> reported that the Findings of Fact for this variance request support a <br />recommendation for approval. However, if the City Council chooses to make a recommendation <br />for denial, the Findings of Fact would need to be amended to reflect the reasons for the denial. He <br />indicated that the Planning Commission reviewed Planning Case 14-014 and recommends <br />approval (5-1) of the variance request for the property located at 1850 Venus Avenue, based on <br />the findings of fact and the submitted plans as presented in the May 27, 2014, Report to the City <br />Council, as amended by the following seven (7) conditions: <br /> <br />1. That the project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by <br />the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the <br />City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City <br />Council. <br />2. That the applicant shall obtain a Grading and Erosion Control Permit from the City before <br />the building permit is issued. <br />3. That the final grade of the lot including the grade of the existing driveway shall be <br />approved by the City. The final grade shall match the character of the neighborhood and <br />the existing grade along the front of the home. <br />4. That grading shall not be allowed outside the property boundary lines without consent <br />from the adjacent property owner. <br />5. That a tree preservation plan and financial surety or escrow for these improvements shall <br />be submitted to the City before the building permit is issued. <br />6. That the structure shall conform to all other regulations in the City Code. That a building <br />permit for the construction of the garage and a zoning permit for the construction of the <br />driveway shall be required. <br />