My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-14-14-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
07-14-14-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/11/2014 8:48:46 AM
Creation date
7/11/2014 8:48:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MAY 27, 201412 <br /> <br />Mayor Grant <br /> questioned if the contractor had considered using a P-trap. <br /> <br />Assistant City Engineer Anderson <br /> indicated he was not familiar with this terminology. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant <br /> requested that the cost estimates be further discussed. <br /> <br />Assistant City Engineer Anderson <br /> reviewed the expenses to remove the ditch and replace the <br />area with curb and gutter. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden <br /> did not believe that the Council had enough information to make a <br />decision on this matter. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant <br /> recommended that the property owner address the Council. <br /> <br />Dave Cmiel <br />, 1861 West Highway 96, appreciated the Cothat MnDOT <br />completed the original drawings and the water runoff was left unaddressed. He feared that if the <br />ditch did not work, the City would have a major concern to address. He commented that no one <br />from the City, County or MnDOT sat down and discussed how the water runoff from the crown <br />would be displaced. He stated that he has had recent discussions with the County and fears how <br />the water runoff from the street could damage his property. He believed that the volume of water <br />flowing down this street would increase after the road was repaved. He is interested in MnDOT <br />having a catch basin stating that this may be a more efficient way to collect the water runoff. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes <br />questioned how the water from the road previously drained. <br /> <br />Mr. Cmiel <br /> stated that there have always been issues with the water runoff. He did not believe <br />that he should be responsible for water running off of the street. He was told by the County and <br />MnDOT that a change needed to be made. It was his opinion that the roadway would remain <br />unfinished in front of his property given the collection of water that would be assumed on his <br />property. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes <br /> asked why this area had a turn around. <br /> <br />Mr. Cmiel <br /> reported that the turnaround serviced five homes in the area, including garbage and <br />mail services. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes <br />questioned how MnDOT and the County would react if the City <br />recommended changes to the plans for this ditch change. <br /> <br />Assistant City Engineer Anderson <br /> commented that a contractor had been hired to complete the <br />ditch and if the City wishes to make a change, this would have to be negotiated with the contractor <br />and the project deadline would have to be extended. There were a number of steps that the City <br />would have to go through in order to make the change and he believed a premium would have to <br />be paid to make the change. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes <br />did not understand why the County or MnDOT would recommend <br />placing a ditch in a residents front yard given the fact this was not a rural area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.