Laserfiche WebLink
Table 9 2030 Minimum Development Scenario Peak Hour Mitigation Analysis Results <br />2030 Baseline Min Mitigated AM 2030 Baseline Min Mitigated PM <br />Intersection <br />LOS Delay (sec) LOS Delay (sec) <br />Old Hwy 8 and CR 96 C 21 C 29 <br />CR 96 and SB I-35W <br />C 20 C 30 <br />Ramp <br />CR 96 and NB I-35W <br />B 19 C 30 <br />Ramp <br />Round Lake Rd W and <br />C 24 C 25 <br />CR 96 <br />TH 10 West Ramp and <br />C 28 D 39 <br />CR 96 <br />CR 96 at US 10 NB <br />Ramp A No Control A No Control <br />CR 96 and TCAAP <br />Property/North C 21 C 29 <br />Heights Church Access <br />CR H and US-10 D 38 D 44 <br />CR H and SB I-35W B 18 B 11 <br />CR H and NB I-35W A 4 A 9 <br />CR I and SB I-35W C 25 C 22 <br />CR I and NB I-35W B 13 B 13 <br />CR I and Old Hwy 8 A 5 A 5 <br />CR I and N Fairview <br />A 6 A 5 <br />Ave <br />b. Maximum Development Scenario <br />Based on results under the unmitigated maximum scenario, the failing intersections and or failing <br />movements were reevaluated with the mitigations previously described. After mitigation, all <br />intersections were operating at LOS D or better with no anticipated operational issues in the AM and <br />Table 10 <br />PM scenarios. The analysis results are presented in , and the total traffic turning movement <br />. <br />Figure T21 <br />volumes are shown in <br />TCAAP Traffic Analysis <br />Technical Memorandum 20 March 2014 <br />