07-28-14-R - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION –June 4, 20143 5.The existing accessory structure encroaches three (3) feet eleven (11) inches into the ten (10) foot setback along the south property line, leaving a setback of six (6) feet one (1) inch between the structure and the south property line. 6.The existing accessory structure does not encroach into the north oreastproperty line setbacks. 7.The proposed accessory structure encroaches twenty-nine (29) feet four (4) inches into the thirty (30) foot setback along the entire length of the structure. 8.The proposed accessory structure encroaches an additionaltwo (2) feet into the south property line setback. 9.The proposed accessory structure increases the footprint from twenty-two (22) feet by twenty-two (22) feet, or 484 square feet,to twenty-four (24) feet by twenty-six (26) feet, or 624 square feet. This would amountto an increase of the building footprint by 140 square feet. 10.The proposed accessory structure would be rotated approximately fifteen (15) degrees to align the garage with the western property line and the angle of the existing home. 11.The proposed accessory structure would change the direction of the roofline from an east/west orientation to a north/south orientation. 12.The existing single family dwelling and attached garage meet all property line setbacks. 13.The proposed structure and landscaping coverages are within the zoning district requirements. 14.The proposed accessory structure would not exceed fifteen (15) feet in height. 15.Detached accessory structures are permitted structures within the R-2 Zoning District. 16.All structures on the lot are outside of the 100-year flood plain, wetlands, and easements. Variance Findings: 17.Detached accessory structures are permitted and a reasonable use within the R-2 Single & Two Family Residential Zoning District. 18.The lot has rather unique characteristics as the property slopes towards Lake Johanna approximately 18 feet from west to east leaving limited options for expansion or movement of the accessory structure to an area that meets the setback regulations. 19.The proposed accessory structure would be visible from neighboring properties; however, the proposed design and the use of quality materials for the detached structure that match the single family dwelling should minimize the impacts on surrounding property owners. 20.The proposed plans and requested variances for the accessory structure do not appear to be based on economic considerations alone. City Planner Streff statedthatthe findings of fact for the variance do not specifically support a recommendation for denial or approval. If the Planning Commission recommends approval of this variance, Staff recommends the following ten (10) conditions: 1.That the project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 2.That the proposed accessory structure shall be permitted to encroach no further into the west and south property lines than the existing structure, leaving a setback of four (4) feet six (6) inches from the west property line and a setback of six (6) feet one (1) inch from the south property line.