My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-28-14-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
07-28-14-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2014 11:55:19 AM
Creation date
7/25/2014 11:55:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Where no sidewalk exists on County Road E new sidewalk will be constructed. In front <br />of Staples the existing sidewalk will be lowered to meet ADA standards for crossing <br />County Road E. <br /> <br />A new sidewalk will be constructed on the west side of Pine Tree Drive from County <br />Road E to approximately 900 feet south. <br /> <br />Boulevard trees will be added to County Road E. <br /> <br />The existing lighting system will be removed and replaced with an Xcel Energy lighting <br />system (style of light poles and fixtures still to be determined). <br /> <br />There are a few issues that the Council should be aware of and/or comment on before the plans <br />are completed. These issues are as follows: <br /> <br /> <br />The feasibility report included some work to define driveway access on Connelly Avenue <br />-o-Gold. Mr. Flaherty has stated that only a striping <br />of the curve is necessary and he did not feel the improvements discussed in the feasibility <br />report should be constructed. That curve has now been striped and at this time we have <br />told the engineers to not proceed with the design of the curb and gutter and driveway <br />improvements. <br /> <br />Discussion of the assessment method and amounts are detailed further in the City <br /> <br /> <br />Furniture property, relative to the inability to continue the sidewalk across <br />the front of the property due to lack of appropriate easements. We could pursue the <br />necessary easements but because it would take away parking, which is very limited on <br />the site, it would likely be viewed by a court as a substantial (large dollars amount) <br />taking. Staff would recommend continuing the trees and lighting across the small green <br />space within the existing right of way <br />a future date. <br /> <br />of this project. A couple of staff recommendations out of these discussions would be that <br />first, the Public Hearing and the Assessment Hearing could be held the same night. <br />There has been a significant public involvement process with this project already. By the <br />time the hearings are held the plans will be very close to 100% done and all of the <br />adjacent properties will have had a chance to view them. Second, because of the nature <br />of the assessment (street scaping vs. typical street reconstruction) it may be appropriate to <br />have the Assessment Hearing before the project is bid. The largest part of the assessment <br />is for street lighting and staff will have a firm price from Xcel Energy by the Hearing <br />date. <br />estimate should be accurate enough for assessment purposes. This way, if there are a <br />number of potential assessment appeals the Council could decide to not proceed to <br />bidding the project. <br /> <br />Staff would recommend adding colored pavers to the new medians. This was not <br />discussed in the feasibility report but would add a nice feature to a relatively large <br />blacktop road. The incremental cost to add pavers from standard concrete for the <br />medians is estimated at $30,000-45,000 for the entire project. <br />23 <br />Page of <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.