Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—MAY 27, 2014 7 <br /> 15. The proposal is consistent with the Arden Hills Comprehensive Plan as it allows the <br /> reasonable use of residential property. <br /> 16. Single family dwelling are permitted and a reasonable use within the R-1 Single Family <br /> Residential Zoning District. <br /> 17. The lot has rather unique characteristics for a corner lot within the City. The property is <br /> situated on a corner lot, of which only one of the right-of-ways, Venus Avenue, consists of <br /> an improved surface. The right-of-way known as Rolling Hills Road along the east side of <br /> the property is unimproved and is used for trail purposes only. There are no plans at this <br /> time to extend or improve this right-of-way. <br /> 18. The proposed addition would be visible from neighboring properties; however, the <br /> addition would not be inconsistent in terms of setbacks and lot coverage requirements for <br /> typical non-corner lots. The property owner would match the materials used for siding and <br /> roofing to the existing dwelling, which should minimize the impacts on surrounding <br /> property owners. <br /> 19. The proposed addition is unlikely to have negative impacts to the property or to the <br /> neighborhood as a whole. Based on the proposed setbacks the property would function as a <br /> typical non-corner lot within the R-1 Single Family Residential District. The trail that has <br /> been constructed within the right-of-way of Rolling Hills Road is not likely to be affected <br /> by the proposed addition. <br /> 20. The proposed plans and variance request for the addition to the single family dwelling <br /> does not appear to be based on economic considerations alone. <br /> City Planner Streff reported that the Findings of Fact for this variance request support a <br /> recommendation for approval. However, if the City Council chooses to make a recommendation <br /> for denial, the Findings of Fact would need to be amended to reflect the reasons for the denial. He <br /> indicated that the Planning Commission reviewed Planning Case 14-014 and recommends <br /> approval (5-1) of the variance request for the property located at 1850 Venus Avenue, based on <br /> the findings of fact and the submitted plans as presented in the May 27, 2014, Report to the City <br /> Council, as amended by the following seven(7) conditions: <br /> 1. That the project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by <br /> the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the <br /> City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City <br /> Council. <br /> 2. That the applicant shall obtain a Grading and Erosion Control Permit from the City before <br /> the building permit is issued. <br /> 3. That the final grade of the lot including the grade of the existing driveway shall be <br /> approved by the City. The final grade shall match the character of the neighborhood and <br /> the existing grade along the front of the home. <br /> 4. That grading shall not be allowed outside the property boundary lines without consent <br /> from the adjacent property owner. <br /> 5. That a tree preservation plan and financial surety or escrow for these improvements shall <br /> be submitted to the City before the building permit is issued. <br /> 6. That the structure shall conform to all other regulations in the City Code. That a building <br /> permit for the construction of the garage and a zoning permit for the construction of the <br /> driveway shall be required. <br />