My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-25-14-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
08-25-14-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2014 11:42:14 AM
Creation date
8/22/2014 11:42:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL JUNE 30, 201412 <br /> <br />City Planner Streff <br /> estimated that the driveway would come out an additional three or four feet, <br />which would make the driveway 18 feet from the lot line. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant <br /> asked if an expanded driveway could go to the lot line. <br /> <br />City Planner Streff <br />stated that this was the case. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes <br /> expressed concern with the slope of the property and how the additional <br />impervious driveway surface would flood the adjacent trail. She suggested that the garage be <br />shifted 90 degrees to lessen the encroachment on the setback. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden <br /> agreed that the grade of the property was concerning. <br /> <br />City Planner Streff <br />commented that the Assistant City Engineer has reviewed the request and <br />that there were no concerns that the new garage and driveway would flood the trail segment. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes <br /> inquired why the requested driveway was so large. <br /> <br />City Planner Streff <br />deferred this question to the applicant. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung <br /> appreciat <br />concerns. He agreed that the driveway was quite large; however, after reviewing City Code, he <br />understood that the driveway could be even larger than what was requested. He supported the <br />revised plans as submitted by the applicant. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden <br /> believed that the City property and trail should be protected. She did <br />not believe that the homeowner should be allowed to encroach into the setback. <br /> <br />Councilmember Werner <br />stated that the applicant has reduced the encroachment with the new <br />proposal and he supported the request. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant <br />explained that he could support the request as well. <br /> <br />MOTION: Councilmember Werner moved and Councilmember McClung seconded a <br />motion to approve Planning Case 14-014 for a variance at 1850 Venus Avenue <br />to encroach eighteen (18) feet into the secondary front yard setback in order <br />to construct a twenty-six (26) foot by thirty (30) foot garage addition, based on <br />the findings of fact and the submitted plans as amended by the seven (7) <br />conditions in the June 30, 2014, Report to the City Council. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes <br /> did not support the request. It was her opinion that the driveway was <br />too large. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant <br /> questioned the distance from the garage to the trail. <br /> <br />City Planner Streff <br /> estimated that the distance from the corner of the garage to the trail would be <br />42 feet. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.