My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-25-14-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
08-25-14-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2014 11:42:14 AM
Creation date
8/22/2014 11:42:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JUNE 30, 20143 <br /> <br />Jon Horn <br />, Kimley-Horn, discussed the four bridges along I-35W that would be reconstructed in <br />and around Arden Hills. He noted that the bridge at County Road F and the bridge at Highway 96 <br />will be replaced in 2015. The bridge at County Road E2 and the bridge at County Road H will be <br />reconstructed in 2016. He noted that several of these bridges play an important role in preparing <br />TCAAP for redevelopment. <br /> <br />The concept design plan for these bridges was reviewed with the Council, and the consensus <br />among the Council limestone elements and a green color <br />scheme. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant <br /> requested further information on how the limestone would be used on the bridges. <br /> <br />Mr. Horn <br /> reported that the limestone would have a stacked stone effect on the bridges. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden <br /> questioned how the lights on County Road H would be selected and if <br />they would have to match the lights chosen by the City of New Brighton. <br /> <br />Mr. Horn <br /> stated that the City could opt to be consistent with lighting on the bridges but this is <br />something New Brighton and Arden Hills should discuss. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Maurer <br /> indicated that there has been discussion amongst the group <br />whether there would be lighting at all or on just some of these bridges. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden <br /> wanted the lighting within TCAAP to be consistent and sustainable. <br />She believed County Road H to be an entrance way into TCAAP. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung <br />supported the proposed bridge design and was in favor of having <br />consistency throughout the I-35W corridor. He did have some concern on the County Road H <br />corridor and wanted the lighting to be consistent with TCAAP. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant <br />agreed. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Maurer <br /> was hoping to maximize the contribution from MnDOT for the <br />bridges through the proposed design. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant <br /> questioned the color scheme and suggested that the bridges be a darker tan color. <br />He suggested that the City pursue LED lighting options for the bridges and TCAAP. He asked if <br />the bridge railing was a MnDOT standard. <br /> <br />Mr. Horn <br /> commented that this particular railing was used on the Rice Street bridge but that other <br />standard designs could be considered for the bridge. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant <br /> suggested that the bridge pillars be darker in color and less white. He believed that <br />this would complement the tan color and green railing. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes <br /> discussed the lights available through Xcel Energy noting that the <br />majority were black in color. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.