Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City of Arden Hills <br />Planning Commission Meeting for September 3, 2014 <br /> <br />P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2014\PC 14-025 - Site Plan Review - 3657 Snelling Avenue\Memos_Reports_14-025 <br /> <br />Page 6 of 8 <br /> <br />12. The proposal is consistent with the Arden Hills Comprehensive Plan as it allows the <br />reasonable use of residential property. <br />13. Detached accessory structures are permitted and a reasonable use within the R-1 Single <br />Family Residential Zoning District. <br />14. The property is rather unique due to the placement of the existing single family dwelling <br />in the rear of the lot approximately two-hundred (200) feet from the front property line. <br />15. The current placement of the single family dwelling leaves limited options for the <br />construction of an accessory structure that meets all setback regulations and minimizes <br />tree loss and final grading. <br />16. The proposed accessory structure would be visible from neighboring properties; however, <br />the proposed location, design and the use of quality materials for the detached structure <br />that are compatible in appearance to the single family dwelling should minimize the <br />impacts on surrounding property owners. <br />17. The proposed accessory structure is unlikely to have negative impacts to the property or <br />to the neighborhood as a whole. <br /> <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />The property is fairly unique when compared to other properties in Arden Hills because of its <br />topography, number of significant trees and the configuration of the single family dwelling on <br />the lot. Because of the lot’s topography, natural drainage pattern, significant trees and the <br />configuration of principal structure at the rear of the lot, options for the movement of the <br />accessory structure to an area that meets all zoning regulations is very limited in order to <br />minimize tree loss and grading on the property. Due to the scope of the project and the proposed <br />addition of an accessory structure, the character of the neighborhood or the City is not expected <br />to be negatively affected. <br /> <br /> <br />Recommendation <br /> <br />The findings of fact for the Site Plan Review support a recommendation for approval. However, <br />if the Planning Commission chooses to make a recommendation for denial, the Findings of Fact <br />would need to be amended to reflect the reasons for the denial. <br /> <br />If the Planning Commission recommends approval of the Site Plan Review, staff recommends <br />the following eight (8) conditions: <br /> <br />1. That the project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as <br />amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as <br />determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning <br />Commission and City Council.