Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City of Arden Hills <br />Planning Commission Meeting for June 4, 2014 <br /> <br />P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2014\PC 14-017 - Variance 3441 Lake Johanna Boulevard\Memo_Reports_14-017 <br /> <br />Page 8 of 11 <br /> <br />9. The proposed accessory structure increases the footprint from twenty-two (22) feet by <br />twenty-two (22) feet or 484 square feet to twenty-four (24) feet by twenty-six (26) feet or <br />624 square feet. An increase of 140 square feet. <br />10. The proposed accessory structure would be rotated approximately fifteen (15) degrees to <br />align the garage with the western property line and the angle of the existing home. <br />11. The proposed accessory structure would change the direction of the roofline from an <br />east/west orientation to a north/south orientation. <br />12. The existing single family dwelling and attached garage meet all property line setbacks. <br />13. The proposed structure and landscaping coverages are within the zoning district <br />requirements. <br />14. The proposed accessory structure would not exceed fifteen (15) feet in height. <br />15. Detached accessory structures are permitted structures within the R-2 Zoning District. <br />16. All structures on the lot are outside of the 100-year flood plain, wetlands, and easements. <br /> <br />Variance Findings: <br />17. Detached accessory structures are permitted and a reasonable use within the R-2 Single & <br />Two Family Residential Zoning District. <br />18. The lot has rather unique characteristics as the property slopes towards Lake Johanna <br />approximately 18 feet from west to east leaving limited options for expansion or <br />movement of the accessory structure to an area that meets the setback regulations. <br />19. The proposed accessory structure would be visible from neighboring properties; however, <br />the proposed design and the use of quality materials for the detached structure that match <br />the single family dwelling should minimize the impacts on surrounding property owners. <br />20. The proposed plans and requested variances for the accessory structure do not appear to <br />be based on economic considerations alone. <br /> <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />A detached accessory structure is a permitted use in the R-2 Zoning District and is a reasonable <br />request for the subject property. However, it is unclear to staff if the expansion of this <br />nonconforming use meets the City’s Variance Criteria under the State’s Law for “Practical <br />Difficulties”. The variance is unlikely to negatively impact the neighborhood or the City as a <br />structure already exists in the proposed location on the property, but the expansion to increase its <br />nonconforming status may or may not be warranted in this situation. Staff is not directly in <br />support of the proposal as submitted; however, with the conditions stated in this report, staff’s <br />concerns could be mitigated. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />