Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – June 4, 2014 7 <br />City Planner Streff requested the Commission provide staff comment on what setbacks would <br />be acceptable. <br />Chair Larson believed that eight inches was not a desirable setback. He stated he could <br />entertain a lesser setback than 30 feet; however, the size of the structure should not be overly <br />expanded. He recommended a reasonable setback from Fairview be created. <br />Commissioner Bartel agreed stating the size of the garage was more of a concern than the <br />setbacks. <br />The motion carried unanimously (6-0). <br />B.Planning Case 14- 0 1 9 ; Zoning Code Amendment – Lighting Regulations – Not a <br />Public Hearing <br />Associate Planner Bachler stated that the 2014 Planning Commission Work Plan was discussed <br />and adopted at the March 17, 2014, City Council Work Session. One of the items on the plan <br />concerns light-emitting diode (LED) lighting. Compared to incandescent lighting, LED lights <br />produce a greater amount of luminosity, or brightness. The City Council asked staff to review the <br />City’s existing regulations on lighting and to update relevant ordinances if necessary to address <br />the potential impacts associated with brighter LED lights. This memo provides an overview of <br />the sections in the Zoning Code that regulate lighting and also discusses ideas for additional <br />regulations that could be considered. Based on the direction provided by the Planning <br />Commission, staff will draft an ordinance that would amend the Zoning Code to update the <br />City’s lighting regulations. <br />Associate Planner Bachler indicated that p rovisions on lighting are generally confined to <br />Section 1325.05 Design Standards in the Zoning Code. Lighting is required to be directed away <br />from adjacent lots and streets and the source of illumination must be controlled in such a way <br />that light is only directed onto the site. The Zoning Code restricts light trespass by stipulating <br />that light cast onto adjacent travel lanes or roadways cannot exceed 1.0 foot candle and 0.4 foot <br />candles on adjoining residential properties. No more than 25 percent of non-residential façades <br />that are visible from residential properties can be illuminated by direct light from a source such <br />as a flood light. <br />Associate Planner Bachler indicated that Section 1320 District Regulations includes special <br />requirements for specific districts in the City. The Neighborhood Business, B-4 Retail Center, <br />Gateway Business, and Civic Center Districts all have special requirements regarding lighting <br />that go beyond the provisions in Section 1325.05: <br />• In the Neighborhood Business District, accent lighting is only permitted when <br />used to delineate the main entrance into a building. Parking lot lighting is <br />restricted to a maximum of 14 feet in height. <br />• In the B-4 Retail Center District, the source of illumination must be concealed so <br />as not to be visible from adjoining lots and streets. Accent lighting of buildings <br />and sites may be permitted by the City. A lighting plan including the location, <br />type, and design of light fixtures is required when development that involves new <br />construction, redevelopment, or significant modification to an existing building is <br />proposed.