07-9-14-PC - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – May 7, 2014 5 City Planner Streff reported this had been discussed with the City Engineer and he understands that the majority of the site would drain towards Venus Avenue to the north and to the east along the Rolling Hills Road right-of-way. Commissioner Holewa asked if this property abutted a City right-of-way. City Planner Streff stated that Venu s Avenue and Rolling Hills Road are both City right-of- ways. Commissioner Holewa asked whether staff had discussed the option of vacating the Rolling Hills Road right-of-way. He explained that if the right-of-way were to be vacated, the need for a variance would be eliminated. Chair Larson stated that if the right-of-way was vacated, the property would have to be divided between the two adjacent property owners. City Planner Streff commented that City staff has discussed the possibility of vacating this right -of-way, which c ould eliminate the need for a variance. However, after discussion among staff, this was not re commended as a feasible option because of the public utilities and the trail located within the right-of-way. Commissioner Hames explained she lived across the street from the subject property. She indicated the original intention was to extend a roa d through between these houses with a cul-de- sac . She noted that a fire hydrant was located within the Rolling Hills Road right-of-way area . She stated for the record that she fully supported the applicant’s request. Commissioner Hames moved and Commissioner Zimmerman seconded a motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 14- 0 14 for a Variance at 1850 Venus Avenue based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the seven (7) conditions in t he May 7 , 2014 , report to the P lanning Commission. T he motion carried 5 - 1 (Holewa opposed). B.Planning Case 14- 0 15 ; PUD Amendment & Site Plan Review – Boston Scientific – 4100 Hamline Avenue North – Public Hearing Chair Larson recused himself on this item. Associate Planner Bachler stated the applicant has requested a Planned Unit Development Amendment and Site Plan Review to construct a 730 square foot addition on the south side of Building 10 on the Boston Scientific Corporation Campus. Associate Planner Bachler reported that Boston Scientific is requesting a Master PUD (11 th ) Amendment and Site Plan Review to construct a 730 gross square foot addition on the south side of Building 10, which is located in the south central portion of the Boston Scientific Campus. Building 10 is also identified on the campus Master Plan as Building D. The purpose of the addition is to provide storage and support for ongoing product development and research. Associate Planner Bachler indicated that t he addition would infill an existing paved courtyard and would match the adjacent roofline at approximately 13 feet above grade. The structure of the building would be concrete masonry with a steel beam and deck roof structure. The exterior finish