My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-7-14-PC
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2010-2019
>
PC Packets 2014
>
05-7-14-PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2015 3:33:34 PM
Creation date
9/22/2014 3:21:56 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Myth and Fact 15 <br />MYTH TWO FFACTTWO <br />Concerned citizens should use the entitlement process to demand high-quality <br />development in their communities while understanding that density and adjacent <br />property values are not inversely related. Higher-density real estate developers <br />and investors in higher-density real estate need to appreciate the fact that most <br />Americans’ wealth is held in their home equity. Therefore, changes in property <br />values can have very real consequences to existing property owners. Likewise, <br />homeowners would benefit from knowing that developers make a substantial <br />financial commitment when investing in new higher-density projects. This invest- <br />ment is an incentive to make the project successful, which can give the commu- <br />nity leverage in working with the developer. Such interrelated and overlapping <br />economic interests among these stakeholders make it all the more likely that a <br />mutually beneficial agreement can be reached. Such an agreement can result in <br />a project that enhances the existing community, ensures the appreciation of resi- <br />dents’, developers’, and the local government’s financial interests, and addresses <br />the needs of current and future residents of the community and region. <br />3.0% <br />2.5% <br />2.0% <br />1.5% <br />1.0% <br />0.5% <br />0% <br />AVERAGE ANNUAL APPRECIATION FOR SINGLE-FAMILY <br />DETACHED HOMES BY NEARNESS TO MULTIFAMILY BUILDINGS <br />Not Near <br />Multifamily <br />2.66% <br />Near <br />Multifamily <br />2.90% <br />Near <br />Low-Rise <br />Multifamily <br />2.91% <br />Near Mid- <br />or High-Rise <br />Multifamily <br />2.79% <br />AVERAGE ANNUAL APPRECIATION RATE <br />PROXIMITY TO MULTIFAMILY <br />Source:NAHB computations based on data in the American Housing Sur vey: 1997 and 1999 (Washington, D.C.: <br />U.S. Bureau of the Census and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, 1997 and 1999).
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.