My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-7-14-PC
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2010-2019
>
PC Packets 2014
>
05-7-14-PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2015 3:33:34 PM
Creation date
9/22/2014 3:21:56 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5 MYTH <br />FACT <br />Low-density development increases air and water pollution and destroys natural <br />areas by paving and urbanizing greater swaths of land. <br />Higher-density development is environmentally more <br />destructive than lower-density development. <br />L ow-density sprawl takes an enormous toll on our air, water, and land. The <br />United States is now losing a staggering 2 million acres of land a year to <br />haphazard, sprawling development.39 More than 50 percent of Americans <br />live in places where the air is unhealthy to breathe,40 and childhood asthma <br />and other respiratory diseases are on the rise.41 Almost half the damage to our <br />streams, lakes, and rivers is the result of polluted runoff from paved surfaces.42 <br />It is inefficient land use, not economic growth, that accounts for the rapid loss of <br />open space and farms. Since 1994, housing lots larger than ten acres have account- <br />ed for 55 percent of the land developed.43 This loss of land often causes unexpect- <br />ed economic challenges for rural communities, where farmland, forests, ranchland, <br />and open space tend to be the economic drivers that attract businesses, residents, <br />and tourists. Low-density sprawl compromises the resources that are the core of <br />the community’s economy and character. The majority of American homeowners <br />think it is important to stop these trends. In fact, 76 percent of local ballot initiatives <br />related to land conservation passed in November 2004, making $2.4 billion in fund- <br />ing available for protection of parks and open space.44 But purchasing land is only <br />part of the solution and not always an option for financially strapped governments. <br />Higher-density development offers the best solution to managing growth and pro- <br />tecting clean air and clean water. Placing new development into already urbanized <br />areas that are equipped with all the basic infrastructure like utility lines, police and <br />fire protection, schools, and shops eliminates the financial and environmental costs <br />of stretching those services farther and farther out from the core community. Com- <br />pact urban design reduces driving and smog and preserves the natural areas that <br />are assets of the community: watersheds, wetlands, working farms, open space, and <br />wildlife corridors. It further minimizes impervious surface area, which causes ero- <br />sion and polluted stormwater runoff. Two studies completed for the state of New <br />Jersey confirm that compact development can achieve a 30 percent reduction in <br />runoff and an 83 percent reduction in water consumption compared with conven- <br />tional suburban development.45 <br />22 Higher-Density Development
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.