My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-7-14-PC
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2010-2019
>
PC Packets 2014
>
05-7-14-PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2015 3:33:34 PM
Creation date
9/22/2014 3:21:56 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
For many Americans density is associated with ugliness, <br />crowding, and congestion, even though it can be shown that, <br />when properly planned and executed, higher density can save <br />land, energy, and dollars. Moreover, many people—includ- <br />ing some trained planners and designers—have difficulty esti- <br />mating density from visual cues or distinguishing quantitative <br />(measured) and qualitative (perceived) density. We tend to <br />overestimate the density of monotonous, amenity-poor devel- <br />opments and underestimate the density of well-designed, <br />attractive projects, thereby reinforcing the negative stereo- <br />types. A primary objective of this work is to correct these <br />misperceptions. <br />This book was commissioned by the Lincoln Institute of <br />Land Policy to help planners, designers, public officials, and <br />citizens better understand—and better communicate to oth- <br />ers—the concept of density as it applies to the residential envi- <br />ronment. The need for such a work is borne out repeatedly <br />by participants in our classroom courses, also titled Visualizing <br />Density,who share stories of proposed residential developments <br />of appropriate density that had been rejected outright or forced <br />to reduce the number of housing units owing to public mis- <br />conceptions about density. This is not to say that every resi- <br />dential project that has failed to win approval on account of its <br />density was necessarily well conceived. To address this issue, <br />the authors also discuss and illustrate the importance of good <br />planning and design in gaining acceptance of density. <br />This book addresses both the “why” and the “how” of <br />density. In the first chapter, “Growing Closer,” Julie Campoli <br />describes the density challenge in the United States: Will we <br />be able to accommodate significant growth in population and <br />housing units while reversing the trend of increasing rates <br />of land consumption? The second chapter, “Patterns of Den- <br />sity,” can be used as a manual on planning and designing for <br />“good” density, bringing together both quantitative and quali- <br />tative aspects of residential development. Finally, “The Den- <br />sity Catalog” is a set of reference images presented in order of <br />increasing density, based on Alex MacLean’s superb aerial pho- <br />tography and clear diagrams of street patterns drawn by Julie <br />Campoli. <br />I am very pleased to be adding this book to the body of <br />materials on planning and urban form produced by the Lincoln <br />Institute. It is the culmination of more than five years of collab- <br />oration with Alex and Julie, who have developed a classroom <br />course offered at sites around the country, as well as illustrated <br />working papers and a Visualizing Density Web site that can be <br />accessed through www.lincolninst.edu. We have packaged this <br />book with a CD of the images in the Density Catalog to facili- <br />tate their noncommercial use in public discussions and educa- <br />tion programs. <br />We hope this dramatic visual material and explanatory <br />text will provide a robust set of tools and techniques for those <br />engaged in planning and designing the roughly 60 million <br />housing units that we can expect to build in this country over <br />the next 25 years. While all density may not be “good” den- <br />sity, it is time we redeem the word and reap the social, eco- <br />nomic, and environmental benefits of creating the right density <br />in the right places. <br /> — Armando Carbonell <br />Chairman <br />Department of Planning and Urban Form <br />Lincoln Institute of Land Policy <br />Foreword <br />vii
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.