My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-7-14-PC
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2010-2019
>
PC Packets 2014
>
05-7-14-PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2015 3:33:34 PM
Creation date
9/22/2014 3:21:56 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Growing Closer <br />residents now live 30 miles or more from downtown. One- <br />fifth live at least 40 miles away (Joint Center for Housing Stud- <br />ies 2005). An increasing number settle not in the city, or even <br />in inner-ring suburbs, but on large parcels in emerging sub- <br />urbs farther afield. This echoes the national trend—40 percent <br />of new homes built between 1985 and 2001 were on lots of <br />more than an acre (Nelson 2004). <br />The Coming Boom <br />To shelter a fast-growing population, the next few decades will <br />bring a significant need for new housing. There were almost <br />116 million units of housing in the United States in 2000. By <br />the time we reach 350 million people in 2030, we’ll need a <br />total of 155 million homes. Considering that about 18 percent <br />of existing units will be lost to fire, natural disasters, or demo- <br />lition in the next 25 years, we’ll need to build about 60 million <br />new units to house the population—that’s more than half of <br />the housing stock on the ground now. And that doesn’t include <br />the 104 billion square feet of new space that will be needed for <br />commercial, industrial, and institutional uses. The next genera- <br />tion of Americans will face an unprecedented building boom <br />(Nelson 2004). <br />Given this need for housing, our tendency to sprawl will <br />place a great strain on our environment and our future econ- <br />omy. How long we can sustain ourselves on our finite land mass <br />will depend on how carefully we use land in this new century. <br />As we face the coming boom, we can choose between two <br />basic approaches to land development—spreading out or grow- <br />ing in and up. <br />Spreading ouT or growing in <br />For the past 50 years we’ve been growing out—extending <br />beyond the limits of existing settlements and converting farm- <br />land, deserts, and forests into building sites. Expansion outward <br />is nothing new. The edges of our cities and towns have tradi- <br />■ <br />■ <br />tionally shifted to accommodate the need for built space. It’s <br />the density of that new growth that has changed. The rapid pace <br />of conversion from resource land to suburb is due not to the <br />amount of development, but to its low density. We are spread- <br />ing fewer people across each square mile and using up more <br />land in the process. <br />The alternative to spreading out is to concentrate—to grow <br />in and up. This is the way we grew before the automobile age <br />transformed our sense of scale and distance. Before World War <br />II, cities expanded outward in small increments in a dense <br />fabric. Developers filled in vacant parcels and rebuilt existing <br />structures, making room for newcomers within an area limited <br />by pedestrian access and public transportation. As they added <br />Buckeye, Arizona <br />041215-0432
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.