My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-7-14-PC
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2010-2019
>
PC Packets 2014
>
05-7-14-PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2015 3:33:34 PM
Creation date
9/22/2014 3:21:56 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – April 9, 2014 4 <br /> <br /> <br />14. Park dedication requirements do not apply. <br />15. The proposal is not anticipated to create a negative impact on the immediate area or the <br />community as a whole. <br />16. The proposal does not conflict with the general purpose or intent of the Zoning Ordinance <br />or Comprehensive Plan for the City. <br /> <br />City Planner Streff stated that based on the submitted plans and the findings of fact, staff <br />recommends approval of Planning Case 14-012 for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) <br />Amendment at 1887 Gateway Boulevard. Staff recommends the following five (5) conditions be <br />included with the approval: <br /> <br />1. That the project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended <br />by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by <br />the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City <br />Council. <br />2. That one (1) additional double walled storage tank shall be permitted on the property and <br />installed within the existing screening fence. <br />3. That the storage tank shall be completely concealed behind the screening fence. <br />4. That the storage tank shall meet all applicable Building, Fire and Mechanical Codes and <br />all County and MPCA regulations. The applicant shall obtain all required permits prior to <br />installation. <br />5. That the system to be installed shall comply with the odor, noise, and other applicable <br />Minnesota Pollution Control Agency regulations. Failure to comply with these <br />regulations may result in a revocation of a permit. <br /> <br />City Planner Streff reviewed the options available to the Planning Commission on this matter: <br /> <br />1. Recommend Approval with Conditions <br />2. Recommend Approval as Submitted <br />3. Recommend Denial <br />4. Table <br /> <br />Chair Larson opened the floor to Commissioner comments. <br /> <br />Commissioner Thompson questioned if the City monitored the odor or smell emitted from the <br />storage tanks. <br /> <br />City Planner Streff commented this was not monitored by the City but would be complaint <br />based. However, the storage tank would be inspected by the City when installed and if there <br />were any issues they would be addressed at that time. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zimmerman asked if Hood Packaging would be hiring additional employees. <br /> <br />Ted Hegstrom, Hood Packaging Corporation, stated his company would be hiring eight to ten <br />new employees. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jones questioned if the new storage tank would be tied into the existing systems.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.