My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-9-14-PC
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2010-2019
>
PC Packets 2014
>
04-9-14-PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2015 3:33:33 PM
Creation date
9/22/2014 3:29:08 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – March 5, 2014 8 <br /> <br />Commissioner Holewa reviewed the average unit sizes for Arden Hills and the surrounding <br />communities. He recommended that Arden Hills’ minimum unit size standards remain as they <br />are currently written and that the market drive apartment sizes and not the City Ordinance. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hames agreed and discussed the size of several three-bedroom homes on the <br />market in Arden Hills. She questioned why the City wanted to require three-bedroom apartments <br />to be larger than some available single-family homes. She believed the minimum standards <br />should not be revised at this time. <br /> <br />Commissioner Holewa asked if the City had minimum size standards for single-family homes. <br /> <br />City Planner Streff stated that single-family homes are required to meet all State building codes <br />regarding minimum size standards and that the City Ordinances do call out minimum standards <br />for single-family homes. <br /> <br />Councilmember Jones explained that he lived in a 1950’s rambler and that it was approximately <br />1,040 square feet in size. He did not believe that the multi-family dwelling unit sizes needed to <br />be amended. <br /> <br />Commissioner Bartel requested comment from Councilmember Holmes on this matter. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes stated that the Council believed that the minimum standards for <br />efficiency units needed to be updated. The topic was first brought to the forefront during the <br />City’s review of the E Street Flats development project. A discussion was held by the Council <br />on the multi-family dwelling unit size standards and an amendment to the Zoning Code was <br />proposed. She explained that the Council wanted to have the standards reviewed prior to <br />redevelopment of the TCAAP site. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hames stated that housing trends ebb and flow and she did not want to see the <br />City have such high minimum standards established that would require developers to request <br />variances in the future. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Thompson agreed with the proposed revised standards for efficiency units. <br />However, she did not support changing all of the multi-family design standards. She did not <br />believe that regulating the size of units would ensure a certain quality of units. She <br />recommended that the unit size be determined by market demand rather than by the City setting <br />specific minimums. <br /> <br />Commissioner Bartel asked if this Ordinance would apply to apartments and condos. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler explained that the standards would apply to condominium and <br />apartment units. <br /> <br />Commissioner Holewa supported the 550 square foot minimum for efficiency units. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hames recommended the denial of the Ordinance and requested that staff redraft <br />the language based on the Planning Commission’s discussion. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.